Number of Representatives
Congress has the power to regulate the size of the House of Representatives, and the size of the House has varied through the years in response to the admission of new states, reapportionment following a census, and the Civil War.
| Year | 1789 | 1791 | 1793 | 1803 | 1813 | 1815 | 1817 | 1819 | 1821 | 1833 | 1835 | 1843 | 1845 | 1847 | 1851 | 1853 | 1857 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representatives | 65 | 69 | 105 | 141 | 182 | 183 | 185 | 187 | 213 | 240 | 242 | 223 | 225 | 227 | 233 | 234 | 237 |
| Year | 1861 | 1863 | 1865 | 1867 | 1869 | 1873 | 1883 | 1889 | 1891 | 1893 | 1901 | 1911 | 1913 | 1959 | 1961 | 1963 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representatives | 178 | 183 | 191 | 193 | 243 | 293 | 325 | 330 | 333 | 357 | 386 | 391 | 435 | 436 | 437 | 435 |
In 1911, Congress passed the Apportionment Act of 1911, also known as 'Public Law 62-5', which capped the size of the United States House of Representatives at 435 seats. Arizona, New Mexico, Alaska, and Hawaii were each granted one representative when first entered the union. During the next reapportionment, the size of the House was again limited to 435 seats, with the seats divided among the states by population, with each state getting at least one seat.
By the 2000s (decade), the U.S. population had more than tripled since the 1911 expansion of the House to its current 435 seats; accordingly, proposals began to be made by commentators such as George F. Will, Robert Novak, and Paul Jacob to further increase the size of the House. For instance, the Wyoming Rule calls for adding enough members to Congress to reduce the population of the average Congressional district to the population of the least populous state's district (i.e. Wyoming's) for a total House size of 547.
Read more about this topic: History Of The United States House Of Representatives
Famous quotes containing the words number of and/or number:
“The world is so full of a number of things,
I’m sure we should all be as happy as kings.”
—Robert Louis Stevenson (1850–1894)
“Take away from the courts, if it could be taken away, the power to issue injunctions in labor disputes, and it would create a privileged class among the laborers and save the lawless among their number from a most needful remedy available to all men for the protection of their business interests against unlawful invasion.... The secondary boycott is an instrument of tyranny, and ought not to be made legitimate.”
—William Howard Taft (1857–1930)