High-speed Rail in Australia - Background

Background

Because the development of railways in Australia pre-dated Federation, each state developed its own system with a different gauge and rolling-stock. The great distances between the colonies meant that planners gave little thought to connecting to other systems. The result of this was a national network of several different gauges; this necessitated train changes at the break-of-gauge, prevented economies of scale, and in some cases eventually resulted in a very expensive standardisation. Despite these disadvantages, for a time rail was the preferred method of interstate travel in Australia. However, the advent of air travel and the private automobile gradually replaced rail as the major passenger services. Rail has been only a marginal passenger-market player in recent decades.

The construction of a high-speed rail link along the east coast of Australia has been the target of several investigations since the early 1980s. Air travel dominates the inter-capital travel market, and intra-rural travel is almost exclusively car-based. Rail has a significant presence in the rural / city fringe commuter market, but inter-capital rail currently has very low market share due to low speeds and infrequent service. However, the duration of travel between the capitals by high-speed rail could be as quick or faster than air travel – a 500 km/h (310 mph) Maglev train could reduce travel time from Melbourne to Sydney to about three hours, while the more conventional 350 km/h (220 mph) technology (such as TGV and Shinkansen) would take about four hours. Various studies and recommendations have asserted that a high speed rail service between the major eastern capital cities could be viable as an alternative to air. Although such studies have generated much interest from the private sector and captured the imagination of the general public upon their release, to date no private-sector proposal has been able to demonstrate financial viability without the need for significant government assistance.

A mature high-speed rail system would be economically competitive with air and automobile travel, provide mass transit without dependence on imported oil, have a duration of travel that would compare with air travel or be quicker, and would reduce national carbon dioxide emissions.

Melbourne–Sydney Sydney–Brisbane Sydney–Canberra
Rhumb-line distance 730 km 770 km
Existing rail distance 963 km (32% greater) 988 km (28% greater)
Existing average speed 92 km/h 73 km/h
Existing travel time 10:30hrs 13:35hrs 4:19hrs
Existing rail services (daily, each way) 2 1
Air travel time (CBD to CBD*) 3:00hrs 3:05hrs
Air services (daily, each way) 118 84
HSR travel time (max. 350 km/h (220 mph)) 4:06hrs 4:24hrs

The major issues preventing the adoption of high-speed rail in Australia include, according to Philip Laird:

  • a high level of competition in domestic air travel, resulting in highly affordable fares.
  • excessive domestic air transport subsidies.
  • that the great inter-city distances exceed those for which high-speed rail can compete effectively against aircraft.
  • a perception of cheap car travel.
  • a lack of tolls on the majority of inter-capital roads.

Read more about this topic:  High-speed Rail In Australia

Famous quotes containing the word background:

    They were more than hostile. In the first place, I was a south Georgian and I was looked upon as a fiscal conservative, and the Atlanta newspapers quite erroneously, because they didn’t know anything about me or my background here in Plains, decided that I was also a racial conservative.
    Jimmy Carter (James Earl Carter, Jr.)

    In the true sense one’s native land, with its background of tradition, early impressions, reminiscences and other things dear to one, is not enough to make sensitive human beings feel at home.
    Emma Goldman (1869–1940)

    Silence is the universal refuge, the sequel to all dull discourses and all foolish acts, a balm to our every chagrin, as welcome after satiety as after disappointment; that background which the painter may not daub, be he master or bungler, and which, however awkward a figure we may have made in the foreground, remains ever our inviolable asylum, where no indignity can assail, no personality can disturb us.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)