Number of Herschel 400 Objects in Each Constellation
| Andromeda 6 | Aquarius 4 | Aquila 3 | Aries 1 | Auriga 6 |
| Boötes 5 | Camelopardalis 5 | Cancer 1 | Canes Venatici 17 | Canis Major 4 |
| Cassiopeia 16 | Cepheus 7 | Cetus 13 | Coma Berenices 24 | Corvus 3 |
| Crater 1 | Cygnus 10 | Delphinus 3 | Draco 5 | Eridanus 3 |
| Gemini 10 | Hercules 2 | Hydra 5 | Lacerta 3 | Leo 23 |
| Leo Minor 10 | Lepus 1 | Libra 1 | Lynx 3 | Monoceros 14 |
| Ophiuchus 15 | Orion 8 | Pegasus 5 | Perseus 10 | Pisces 2 |
| Puppis 13 | Pyxis 2 | Sagittarius 18 | Scorpius 2 | Sculptor 3 |
| Scutum 2 | Serpens 1 | Sextans 4 | Taurus 2 | Triangulum 1 |
| Ursa Major 46 | Ursa Minor 1 | Virgo 50 | Vulpecula 6 |
Read more about this topic: Herschel 400 Catalogue
Famous quotes containing the words number of, number, herschel and/or objects:
“There is not to be found, in all history, any miracle attested by a sufficient number of men, of such unquestioned good sense, education, and learning, as to secure us against all delusion in themselves ... beyond all suspicion of any design to deceive others ... and at the same time attesting facts, performed in such a public manner, and in so celebrated a part of the world, as to render the detection unavoidable.”
—David Hume (1711–1776)
“No Government can be long secure without a formidable Opposition. It reduces their supporters to that tractable number which can be managed by the joint influences of fruition and hope. It offers vengeance to the discontented, and distinction to the ambitious; and employs the energies of aspiring spirits, who otherwise may prove traitors in a division or assassins in a debate.”
—Benjamin Disraeli (1804–1881)
“Science is the knowledge of many, orderly and methodically
digested and arranged, so as to become attainable by one. The
knowledge of reasons and their conclusions constitutes abstract, that of causes and their effects, and of the laws of nature, natural science.”
—John Frederick William Herschel (1792–1871)
“Consciousness, we shall find, is reducible to relations between objects, and objects we shall find to be reducible to relations between different states of consciousness; and neither point of view is more nearly ultimate than the other.”
—T.S. (Thomas Stearns)