HEC Lausanne - Exchange Programs

Exchange Programs

True to its international vocation, the faculty has established, in addition to international agreements of the University of Lausanne, a network of preferred collaborations with many partners. Among the faculty agreements, Socrates-Erasmus agreements, bilateral agreements and academic mobility programs in Switzerland, HEC Lausanne counts more than 90 partner universities.

Among them :

  • in the USA: Columbia University, Texas A&M University, UCLA Anderson School of Management, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Claremont Graduate University
  • in Canada: HEC Montréal, McGill University, University of British Columbia, Richard Ivey School of Business
  • in Germany: European Business School, Freie Universität Berlin, WHU-Otto Beisheim School of Management, Universität Mannheim, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • in India: Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
  • in China: Chinese University of Hong Kong, University of Hong Kong (HKU), Peking University, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
  • in Switzerland: University of St. Gallen, University of Zurich
  • in Italy: Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi
  • but also : in France (Sciences Po Paris) ; in South Korea (KAIST) ; in Belgium (Université catholique de Louvain, UCL) ; in Norway (Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, NHH) ; in the UK (University of Strathclyde) ; in Singapore (National University of Singapore, NUS; Singapore Management University, SMU) ; in Australia (University of Sydney) and many more

Complete list: HEC Lausanne Exchange programs

Read more about this topic:  HEC Lausanne

Famous quotes containing the words exchange and/or programs:

    “Development, it turns out, occurs through this process of progressively more complex exchange between a child and somebody else—especially somebody who’s crazy about that child.”
    —Urie Bronfenbrenner (b. 1917)

    “Short of a wholesale reform of college athletics—a complete breakdown of the whole system that is now focused on money and power—the women’s programs are just as doomed as the men’s are to move further and further away from the academic mission of their colleges.... We have to decide if that’s the kind of success for women’s sports that we want.”
    —Christine H. B. Grant, U.S. university athletic director. As quoted in the Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A42 (May 12, 1993)