Exchange Programs
True to its international vocation, the faculty has established, in addition to international agreements of the University of Lausanne, a network of preferred collaborations with many partners. Among the faculty agreements, Socrates-Erasmus agreements, bilateral agreements and academic mobility programs in Switzerland, HEC Lausanne counts more than 90 partner universities.
Among them :
- in the USA: Columbia University, Texas A&M University, UCLA Anderson School of Management, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Claremont Graduate University
- in Canada: HEC Montréal, McGill University, University of British Columbia, Richard Ivey School of Business
- in Germany: European Business School, Freie Universität Berlin, WHU-Otto Beisheim School of Management, Universität Mannheim, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
- in India: Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
- in China: Chinese University of Hong Kong, University of Hong Kong (HKU), Peking University, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
- in Switzerland: University of St. Gallen, University of Zurich
- in Italy: Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi
- but also : in France (Sciences Po Paris) ; in South Korea (KAIST) ; in Belgium (Université catholique de Louvain, UCL) ; in Norway (Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, NHH) ; in the UK (University of Strathclyde) ; in Singapore (National University of Singapore, NUS; Singapore Management University, SMU) ; in Australia (University of Sydney) and many more
Complete list: HEC Lausanne Exchange programs
Read more about this topic: HEC Lausanne
Famous quotes containing the words exchange and/or programs:
“If mass communications blend together harmoniously, and often unnoticeably, art, politics, religion, and philosophy with commercials, they bring these realms of culture to their common denominator—the commodity form. The music of the soul is also the music of salesmanship. Exchange value, not truth value, counts.”
—Herbert Marcuse (1898–1979)
“Although good early childhood programs can benefit all children, they are not a quick fix for all of society’s ills—from crime in the streets to adolescent pregnancy, from school failure to unemployment. We must emphasize that good quality early childhood programs can help change the social and educational outcomes for many children, but they are not a panacea; they cannot ameliorate the effects of all harmful social and psychological environments.”
—Barbara Bowman (20th century)