Gurmant Grewal - Electoral Results

Electoral Results

Canadian federal election, 2004: Newton-North Delta
Party Candidate Votes % ±pp Expenditures
Conservative Gurmant Grewal 13,529 32.81%
Liberal Sukh Dhaliwal 13,009 31.55%
New Democratic Nancy Clegg 12,037 29.19%
Green John Hague 2,555 6.19%
Communist Nazir Rizvi 98 0.23%
Total valid votes 41,444 100.00%
Total rejected ballots 184
Turnout 43,660
Canadian federal election, 2000: Surrey Central
Party Candidate Votes % ±pp Expenditures
Alliance Gurmant Grewal 29,812 51.6% +17.8%
Liberal Peter Warkentin 19,513 33.8%
Progressive Conservative Dan Baxter 3,940 6.8%
New Democratic Dan Goy 3,211 5.6%
Green David Walters 1,175 2.0%
Communist Harjit Daudharia 114 0.2%
Total valid votes 57,765 99.7%
Total rejected ballots 196 0.3%
Turnout 57,961 59.5%

Note: Canadian Alliance vote is compared to Reform vote in 1997.

Canadian federal election, 1997: Surrey Central
Party Candidate Votes % ±pp Expenditures
Reform Gurmant Grewal 17,461 34.67 n/a $32,008
Liberal Palbinder Shergill 14,595 28.98 n/a $65,570
New Democratic Charan Gill 7,064 14.02 n/a $58,025
Independent Mike Runte 4,596 9.12 n/a $25,401
Progressive Conservative Vincent Antonio 4,327 8.59 n/a $24,601
Christian Heritage Bill Stilwell 978 1.94 n/a $2,944
Canadian Action Philip McCormack 634 1.25 n/a $3,497
Green Imtiaz Popat 417 0.82 n/a 0
Natural Law Val Litwin 147 0.29 n/a 0
Independent Gaetan Myre 140 0.27 n/a $681
Total valid votes/Expense limit 50,359 100 n/a $66,100
Total rejected ballots 368 0.73
Turnout 50,727 61.62
Source: votes, totals, and expenditures.

Read more about this topic:  Gurmant Grewal

Famous quotes containing the words electoral and/or results:

    Power is action; the electoral principle is discussion. No political action is possible when discussion is permanently established.
    Honoré De Balzac (1799–1850)

    A distinction of property results from that very protection which a free Government gives to unequal faculties of acquiring it.
    James Madison (1751–1836)