Definition
Suppose G is a finitely generated group; and T is a finite symmetric set of generators (symmetric means that if then ). Any element can be expressed as a word in the T-alphabet
Let us consider the subset of all elements of G which can be presented by such a word of length ≤ n
This set is just the closed ball of radius n in the word metric d on G with respect to the generating set T:
More geometrically, is the set of vertices in the Cayley graph with respect to T which are within distance n of the identity.
Given two nondecreasing positive functions a and b one can say that they are equivalent if there is a constant C such that
for example if .
Then the growth rate of the group G can be defined as the corresponding equivalence class of the function
where denotes the number of elements in the set . Although the function depends on the set of generators T its rate of growth does not (see below) and therefore the rate of growth gives an invariant of a group.
The word metric d and therefore sets depend on the generating set T. However, any two such metrics are bilipschitz equivalent in the following sense: for finite symmetric generating sets E, F, there is a positive constant C such that
As an immediate corollary of this inequality we get that the growth rate does not depend on the choice of generating set.
Read more about this topic: Growth Rate (group Theory)
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“... if, as women, we accept a philosophy of history that asserts that women are by definition assimilated into the male universal, that we can understand our past through a male lens—if we are unaware that women even have a history—we live our lives similarly unanchored, drifting in response to a veering wind of myth and bias.”
—Adrienne Rich (b. 1929)
“The man who knows governments most completely is he who troubles himself least about a definition which shall give their essence. Enjoying an intimate acquaintance with all their particularities in turn, he would naturally regard an abstract conception in which these were unified as a thing more misleading than enlightening.”
—William James (1842–1910)
“It’s a rare parent who can see his or her child clearly and objectively. At a school board meeting I attended . . . the only definition of a gifted child on which everyone in the audience could agree was “mine.””
—Jane Adams (20th century)