Representing Rational Numbers As Golden Ratio Base Numbers
Every non-negative rational number can be represented as a recurring base-φ expansion, as can any non-negative element of the field Q = Q + √5Q, the field generated by the rational numbers and √5. Conversely any recurring (or terminating) base-φ expansion is a non-negative element of Q. Some examples (with spaces added for emphasis):
- 1/2 ≈ 0.010 010 010 010 ... φ
- 1/3 ≈ 0.00101000 00101000 00101000... φ
- √5 = 10.1φ
- 2+(1/13)√5 ≈ 10.010 1000100010101000100010000000 1000100010101000100010000000 1000100010101000100010000000 ...φ
The justification that a rational gives a recurring expansion is analogous to the equivalent proof for a base-n numeration system (n=2,3,4,...). Essentially in base-φ long division there are only a finite number of possible remainders, and so once there must be a recurring pattern. For example with 1/2 = 1/10.01φ = 100φ/1001φ long division looks like this (note that base-φ subtraction may be hard to follow at first):
.0 1 0 0 1 ________________________ 1 0 0 1 ) 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 trade: 10000 = 1100 = 1011 ------- so 10000-1001 = 1011-1001 = 10 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ------- etc.The converse is also true, in that a number with a recurring base-φ; representation is an element of the field Q. This follows from the observation that a recurring representation with period k involves a geometric series with ratio φ-k, which will sum to an element of Q.
Read more about this topic: Golden Ratio Base
Famous quotes containing the words representing, rational, numbers, golden, ratio and/or base:
“There are people who are so presumptuous that they know no other way to praise a greatness that they publicly admire than by representing it as a preliminary stage and bridge leading to themselves.”
—Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900)
“What is rational is actual and what is actual is rational. On this conviction the plain man like the philosopher takes his stand, and from it philosophy starts in its study of the universe of mind as well as the universe of nature.”
—Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770–1831)
“All experience teaches that, whenever there is a great national establishment, employing large numbers of officials, the public must be reconciled to support many incompetent men; for such is the favoritism and nepotism always prevailing in the purlieus of these establishments, that some incompetent persons are always admitted, to the exclusion of many of the worthy.”
—Herman Melville (1819–1891)
“But wishes breed not, neither
Can we fend off rock arrival,
Lie watching yellow until the golden weather
Breaks, O my heart’s blood, like a heart and hill.”
—Dylan Thomas (1914–1953)
“A magazine or a newspaper is a shop. Each is an experiment and represents a new focus, a new ratio between commerce and intellect.”
—John Jay Chapman (1862–1933)
“You see how this House of Commons has begun to verify all the ill prophecies that were made of it—low, vulgar, meddling with everything, assuming universal competency, and flattering every base passion—and sneering at everything noble refined and truly national. The direct tyranny will come on by and by, after it shall have gratified the multitude with the spoil and ruin of the old institutions of the land.”
—Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772–1834)