The Genus of A Formal Power Series
A sequence of polynomials K1, K2,... in variables p1,p2,... is called multiplicative if
- 1 + p1z + p2z2 + ... = (1 + q1z + q2z2 + ...) (1 + r1z + r2z2 + ...)
implies that
- ΣKj(p1,p2,...)zj = ΣKj(q1,q2,...)zjΣKk(r1,r2,...)zk
If Q(z) is a formal power series in z with constant term 1, we can define a multiplicative sequence
- K = 1+ K1 + K2 + ...
by
- K(p1,p2,p3,...) = Q(z1)Q(z2)Q(z3)...
where pk is the k'th elementary symmetric function of the indeterminates zi. (The variables pk will often in practice be Pontryagin classes.)
The genus φ of oriented manifolds corresponding to Q is given by
- φ(X) = K(p1,p2,p3,...)
where the pk are the Pontryagin classes of X. The power series Q is called the characteristic power series of the genus φ. Thom's theorem, which states that the rationals tensored with the cobordism ring is a polynomial algebra in generators of degree 4k for positive integers k, implies that this gives a bijection between formal power series Q with rational coefficients and leading coefficient 1, and genera from oriented manifolds to the rational numbers.
Read more about this topic: Genus Of A Multiplicative Sequence
Famous quotes containing the words genus, formal, power and/or series:
“Methinks it would be some advantage to philosophy if men were named merely in the gross, as they are known. It would be necessary only to know the genus and perhaps the race or variety, to know the individual. We are not prepared to believe that every private soldier in a Roman army had a name of his own,—because we have not supposed that he had a character of his own.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“The conviction that the best way to prepare children for a harsh, rapidly changing world is to introduce formal instruction at an early age is wrong. There is simply no evidence to support it, and considerable evidence against it. Starting children early academically has not worked in the past and is not working now.”
—David Elkind (20th century)
“He utters substantial English thoughts in plainest English dialects.... Indeed, for fluency and skill in the use of the English tongue, he is a master unrivaled. His felicity and power of expression surpass even his special merits as historian and critic.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“A sophistical rhetorician, inebriated with the exuberance of his own verbosity, and gifted with an egotistical imagination that can at all times command an interminable and inconsistent series of arguments to malign an opponent and to glorify himself.”
—Benjamin Disraeli (1804–1881)