Proof of The Irreducibility Statement
We prove the irreducibility statement directly in the setting of a UFD R. As mentioned above a non-constant polynomial is irreducible in R if and only if it is primitive and not a product of two non-constant polynomials in F. Being irreducible in F certainly excludes the latter possibility (since those non-constant polynomials would remain non-invertible in F), so the essential point left to prove is that if P is non-constant and irreducible in R then it is irreducible in F.
Note first that in F\{0} any class of associate elements (whose elements are related by multiplication by nonzero elements of the field F) meets the set of primitive elements in R: starting from an arbitrary element of the class, one can first (if necessary) multiply by a nonzero element of R to enter into the subset R (removing denominators), then divide by the greatest common divisor of all coefficients to obtain a primitive polynomial. Now assume that P is reducible in F, so P = ST with S,T non-constant polynomials in F. One can replace S and T by associate primitive elements S′, T′, and obtain P = αS′T′ for some nonzero α in F. But S′T′ is primitive in R by the primitivity statement, so α must lie in R (if written as an irreducible fraction, its denominator has to divide all coefficients of S′T′ because αS′T′ lies in R, but that means the denominator is invertible in R), and the decomposition P = αS′T′ contradicts the irreducibility of P in R.
Read more about this topic: Gauss's Lemma (polynomial)
Famous quotes containing the words proof of the, proof of, proof and/or statement:
“When children feel good about themselves, its like a snowball rolling downhill. They are continually able to recognize and integrate new proof of their value as they grow and mature.”
—Stephanie Martson (20th century)
“Ah! I have penetrated to those meadows on the morning of many a first spring day, jumping from hummock to hummock, from willow root to willow root, when the wild river valley and the woods were bathed in so pure and bright a light as would have waked the dead, if they had been slumbering in their graves, as some suppose. There needs no stronger proof of immortality. All things must live in such a light. O Death, where was thy sting? O Grave, where was thy victory, then?”
—Henry David Thoreau (18171862)
“It comes to pass oft that a terrible oath, with a swaggering accent sharply twanged off, gives manhood more approbation than ever proof itself would have earned him.”
—William Shakespeare (15641616)
“The most distinct and beautiful statement of any truth must take at last the mathematical form.”
—Henry David Thoreau (18171862)