Distinction Between Free Imperial Cities and Other Cities
Of the approximately 4000 urban settlements of the Empire - with over nine-tenth having fewer than 1000 inhabitants around 1600 - fewer than 200 enjoyed the status of Free Imperial City during the late Middle Ages, in some cases only for a few decades. The military tax register (Reichsmatrikel) of 1521 listed 85, a figure that was down to 65 by the time of the Peace of Augsburg in 1555. From the Peace of Westphalia of 1648 to 1803, their number oscillated at around 50.
Unlike the Free Imperial Cities, the second category of towns and cities - the territorial cities - were subject to a lay or ecclesiastical lord, and while many of them enjoyed self-rule to varying degrees, this was a precarious privilege which might be curtailed or abolished according to the will of the lord.
Reflecting the extraordinary complex constitutional set-up of the Holy Roman Empire, a third category, composed of semi-autonomous cities that belonged to neither of those two types, is distinguished by some historians. They were cities whose size and economic strength was sufficient to sustain a substantial independence from surrounding territorial lords for a considerable long time, even though no formal right to independence existed. Those cities were typically located in small territories where the ruler was weak. They were nevertheless the exception among the multitude of territorial towns and cities. Cities of both latter categories normally had representation in territorial diets (Landtage), but not in the Reichstag.
Read more about this topic: Free Imperial City
Famous quotes containing the words distinction between, distinction, free, imperial and/or cities:
“There is nothing more likely to drive a man mad, than the being unable to get rid of the idea of the distinction between right and wrong, and an obstinate, constitutional preference of the true to the agreeable.”
—William Hazlitt (1778–1830)
“He says a man may perhaps answer, that the necessity of things held by him, is not a stoical necessity, but a Christian necessity, &c. But this distinction I have not used, nor indeed have ever heard before, nor could I think any man could make stoical and Christian two kinds of necessity, though they may be two kinds of doctrine”
—Thomas Hobbes (1579–1688)
“If there be a love pure and free from the admixture of our other passions, it is that which lies hidden in the bottom of our heart, and which we know not ourselves.”
—François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)
“If you are ambitious of climbing up to the difficult, and in a manner inaccessible, summit of the Temple of Fame, your surest way is to leave on one hand the narrow path of Poetry, and follow the narrower track of Knight-Errantry, which in a trice may raise you to an imperial throne.”
—Miguel De Cervantes (1547–1616)
“The only phenomenon with which writing has always been concomitant is the creation of cities and empires, that is the integration of large numbers of individuals into a political system, and their grading into castes or classes.... It seems to have favored the exploitation of human beings rather than their enlightenment.”
—Claude Lévi-Strauss (b. 1908)