Explanation
Reactance is the imaginary part of the complex electrical impedance. The specification that the network must be passive and lossless implies that there are no resistors (lossless), or amplifiers or energy sources (passive) in the network. The network consequently must consist entirely of inductors and capacitors and the impedance will be purely an imaginary number with zero real part. Other than that, the theorem is quite general, in particular, it applies to distributed element circuits although Foster formulated it in terms of discrete inductors and capacitors. Foster's theorem applies equally to the admittance of a network, that is the susceptance (imaginary part of admittance) of a passive, lossless one-port monotonically increases with frequency. This result may seem counterintuitive since admittance is the reciprocal of impedance, but is easily proved. If an impedance,
- where,
- is impedance
- is reactance
- is the imaginary unit
then the admittance is given by
- where,
- is admittance
- is susceptance
If X is monotonically increasing with frequency then 1/X must be monotonically decreasing. −1/X must consequently be monotonically increasing and hence it is proved that B is increasing also. It is often the case in network theory that a principle or procedure apply equally to impedance or admittance as they do here. It is convenient in these circumstances to use the concept of immittance which can mean either impedance or admittance. The mathematics are carried out without stating which it is or specifying units until it is desired to calculate a specific example. Foster's theorem can thus be stated in a more general form as,
-
- Foster's theorem (immittance form)
- The imaginary immittance of a passive, lossless one-port monotonically increases with frequency.
Read more about this topic: Foster's Reactance Theorem
Famous quotes containing the word explanation:
“The explanation of the propensity of the English people to portrait painting is to be found in their relish for a Fact. Let a man do the grandest things, fight the greatest battles, or be distinguished by the most brilliant personal heroism, yet the English people would prefer his portrait to a painting of the great deed. The likeness they can judge of; his existence is a Fact. But the truth of the picture of his deeds they cannot judge of, for they have no imagination.”
—Benjamin Haydon (1786–1846)
“Are cans constitutionally iffy? Whenever, that is, we say that we can do something, or could do something, or could have done something, is there an if in the offing—suppressed, it may be, but due nevertheless to appear when we set out our sentence in full or when we give an explanation of its meaning?”
—J.L. (John Langshaw)
“Natural selection, the blind, unconscious, automatic process which Darwin discovered, and which we now know is the explanation for the existence and apparently purposeful form of all life, has no purpose in mind. It has no mind and no mind’s eye. It does not plan for the future. It has no vision, no foresight, no sight at all. If it can be said to play the role of the watchmaker in nature, it is the blind watchmaker.”
—Richard Dawkins (b. 1941)