Prevailing Circumstances of Use
A fortiori reasoning is most often adduced in order to reinforce a claim already demonstrated by other means, though the binary-logical form is occasionally invoked in order to make a previously implicit proposition explicit for the sake of convenience and clarity in further treatment. If an argument's proponent attempts to corroborate a point made earlier in an argument by comparing a stronger (more contentful) claim made later in the argument, the proponent should take care that the relevant portion of the stronger claim does not rely for justification on the earlier claim being corroborated; if it does, the effort at corroboration will not succeed, being an instance of the fallacy known as petitio principii ("begging the premise," related to but distinct from "begging the question").
This argument is regularly used in Jewish Law under the name Kal vachomer (Light and Heavy).
In ancient Indian logic (Nyaya), the a fortiori inference is known as kaimutika or kaimutya nyaya, from the words kim uta, meaning "even more so."
In Islamic jurisprudence, a fortiori arguments are among the methods used in Qiyas (reasoning by analogy).
Read more about this topic: Fortiori
Famous quotes containing the word prevailing:
“Perhaps our own woods and fields,—in the best wooded towns, where we need not quarrel about the huckleberries,—with the primitive swamps scattered here and there in their midst, but not prevailing over them, are the perfection of parks and groves, gardens, arbors, paths, vistas, and landscapes. They are the natural consequence of what art and refinement we as a people have.... Or, I would rather say, such were our groves twenty years ago.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)