Faro Shuffle - Group Theory Aspects

Group Theory Aspects

In mathematics, a perfect shuffle can be considered to be an element of the symmetric group.

More generally, in, the perfect shuffle is the permutation that splits the set into 2 piles and interleaves them:

\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & \cdots \\ 1 & n+1 & 2 & n+2 & \cdots \end{pmatrix}

Formally, it sends

k \mapsto \begin{cases} 2k-1 & k\leq n\\ 2(k-n) & k> n \end{cases}

Analogously, the -perfect shuffle permutation is the element of that splits the set into k piles and interleaves them.

The -perfect shuffle, denote it, is the composition of the -perfect shuffle with an -cycle, so the sign of is:

The sign is thus 4-periodic:

\mbox{sgn}(\rho_n) = (-1)^{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor} = \begin{cases} +1 & n \equiv 0,1 \pmod{4}\\ -1 & n \equiv 2,3 \pmod{4} \end{cases}

The first few perfect shuffles are: and are trivial, and is the transposition .

Read more about this topic:  Faro Shuffle

Famous quotes containing the words group, theory and/or aspects:

    “He hung out of the window a long while looking up and down the street. The world’s second metropolis. In the brick houses and the dingy lamplight and the voices of a group of boys kidding and quarreling on the steps of a house opposite, in the regular firm tread of a policeman, he felt a marching like soldiers, like a sidewheeler going up the Hudson under the Palisades, like an election parade, through long streets towards something tall white full of colonnades and stately. Metropolis.”
    —John Dos Passos (1896–1970)

    “We commonly say that the rich man can speak the truth, can afford honesty, can afford independence of opinion and action;—and that is the theory of nobility. But it is the rich man in a true sense, that is to say, not the man of large income and large expenditure, but solely the man whose outlay is less than his income and is steadily kept so.”
    —Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    “The power of a text is different when it is read from when it is copied out.... Only the copied text thus commands the soul of him who is occupied with it, whereas the mere reader never discovers the new aspects of his inner self that are opened by the text, that road cut through the interior jungle forever closing behind it: because the reader follows the movement of his mind in the free flight of day-dreaming, whereas the copier submits it to command.”
    —Walter Benjamin (1892–1940)