Faisal–Weizmann Agreement

The Faisal–Weizmann Agreement was signed on 3 January 1919, by Emir Faisal (son of the King of Hejaz), who was for a short time King of the Arab Kingdom of Syria or Greater Syria in 1920, and was King of the Kingdom of Iraq (today, Iraq) from August 1921 to 1933, and Chaim Weizmann (later President of the World Zionist Organization) as part of the Paris Peace Conference, 1919 settling disputes stemming from World War I. It was a short-lived agreement for Arab-Jewish cooperation on the development of a Jewish homeland in Palestine and an Arab nation in a large part of the Middle East.

One or more of the Allies may have suggested that a representative of the Zionist Organization secure the agreement. The secret Sykes-Picot Agreement had called for an 'Arab State or a Confederation of Arab States'... ...'under the suzerainty of an Arab chief.' The French and British also proposed 'an international administration, the form of which is to be decided upon after consultation with Russia, and subsequently in consultation with the other Allies, 'and the representatives of the Shereef of Mecca.'

Read more about Faisal–Weizmann Agreement:  Overview, Background, The Agreement, Implementation, Arab-Israeli Peace Diplomacy and Treaties

Other articles related to "agreement, agreements":

Faisal I Of Iraq - Post World War I - Faisal–Weizmann Agreement
... of the World Zionist Organization signed the Faisal–Weizmann Agreement for Arab-Jewish cooperation, in which Faisal conditionally accepted the Balfour Declaration based on the fulfillment of British ... Weizmann argued that since the fulfillment was kept eventually, the agreement of development of a Jewish homeland in Palestine still held ...
Faisal–Weizmann Agreement - Arab-Israeli Peace Diplomacy and Treaties
... Faisal–Weizmann Agreement (1919) Paris Peace Conference, 1949 ... Armistice Agreements Camp David Accords (1978) Israel-Egypt Peace Treaty (1979) Madrid Conference of 1991 ...

Famous quotes containing the word agreement:

    The doctrine of those who have denied that certainty could be attained at all, has some agreement with my way of proceeding at the first setting out; but they end in being infinitely separated and opposed. For the holders of that doctrine assert simply that nothing can be known; I also assert that not much can be known in nature by the way which is now in use. But then they go on to destroy the authority of the senses and understanding; whereas I proceed to devise helps for the same.
    Francis Bacon (1560–1626)