Exeter Crossing Loop Collision - Questions

Questions

Questions were swiftly raised as to why two trains should collide when the goods train should have had the protection of the Home signal. The Mail train driver claimed that the Distant signal was Clear when he passed it, however as there was a thick fog at the time, he did not sight the Home signal, which was against him, until the train was right upon it.

At a subsequent trial, the driver of the Mail was brought before the Goulburn Circuit Court charged with manslaughter. At that trial, the Night Officer at Exeter gave evidence to the effect that the Down Distant signal was in fact at Danger at the time the Mail train passed. The Night Officer further stated that there was no fog that night, but that just before the Goods train arrived a slight mist had set in. However, the Goods train driver gave conflicting evidence, stating that on the night of the accident the denseness of the fog made it difficult to see the signals.

Read more about this topic:  Exeter Crossing Loop Collision

Famous quotes containing the word questions:

    If you think about it seriously, all the questions about the soul and the immortality of the soul and paradise and hell are at bottom only a way of seeing this very simple fact: that every action of ours is passed on to others according to its value, of good or evil, it passes from father to son, from one generation to the next, in a perpetual movement.
    Antonio Gramsci (1891–1937)

    Do your children view themselves as successes or failures? Are they being encouraged to be inquisitive or passive? Are they afraid to challenge authority and to question assumptions? Do they feel comfortable adapting to change? Are they easily discouraged if they cannot arrive at a solution to a problem? The answers to those questions will give you a better appraisal of their education than any list of courses, grades, or test scores.
    Lawrence Kutner (20th century)

    Certainly the philosopher of ‘possible worlds’ must take care that his technical apparatus not push him to ask questions whose meaningfulness is not supported by our original intuitions of possibility that gave the apparatus its point.
    Saul Kripke (b. 1940)