Excess Profits Tax - History

History

In 1863 the Confederate congress and the state of Georgia experimented with excess profits taxes, perhaps, the first time it has happened in American history. The first effective national excess profits tax was enacted in 1917, with rates graduated from 20 to 60 percent on the profits of all businesses in excess of prewar earnings but not less than 7 percent or more than 9 percent of invested capital. In 1918 a national law limited the tax to corporations and increased the rates. Concurrent with this 1918 tax, the federal government imposed, for the year 1918 only, an alternative tax, ranging up to 80 percent, with the taxpayer paying whichever was higher. In 1921 the excess profits tax was repealed despite powerful attempts to make it permanent. In 1933 and 1935 Congress enacted two mild excess profits taxes as supplements to a capital stock tax.

The crisis of World War II led Congress to pass four excess profits statutes between 1940 and 1943. The 1940 rates ranged from 25 to 50 percent and the 1941 ones from 35 to 60 percent. In 1942 a flat rate of 90 percent was adopted, with a postwar refund of 10 percent; in 1943 the rate was increased to 95 percent, with a 10 percent refund. Congress gave corporations two alternative excess profits tax credit choices: either 95 percent of average earnings for 1936–1939 or an invested capital credit, initially 8 percent of capital but later graduated from 5 to 8 percent. In 1945 Congress repealed the tax, effective 1 January 1946. The Korean War induced Congress to reimpose an excess profits tax, effective from 1 July 1950 to 31 December 1953. The tax rate was 30 percent of excess profits with the top corporate tax rate rising from 45% to 47%, a 70 percent ceiling for the combined corporation and excess profits taxes.

In 1991 some members of Congress sought unsuccessfully to pass an excess profits tax of 40 percent upon the larger oil companies as part of energy policy. Some social reformers have championed a peacetime use of the excess profits tax, but such proposals face strong opposition from businesses and some economists, who argue that it would create a disincentive to capital investment.

Tax Acts of the United States
Internal
Revenue
  • 1861
  • 1862
  • 1864
  • 1913
  • 1916
  • 1917
  • 1918
  • 1921
  • 1924
  • 1926
  • 1928
  • 1932
  • 1934
  • 1935
  • 1936
  • 1940
  • 1940
  • 1941
  • 1942
  • 1943
  • 1943
  • 1944
  • 1945
  • 1948
  • 1950
  • 1950
  • 1951
  • 1954
  • 1954 Code
  • 1962
  • 1964
  • 1968
  • 1969
  • 1971
  • 1975
  • 1976
  • 1977
  • 1978
  • 1981
  • 1982
  • Gas Tax
  • 1984
  • COBRA
  • 1986
  • 1986 Code
  • 1990
  • 1993
  • 1996
  • 1997
  • 1998
  • 2001
  • 2002
  • 2003
  • 2004
  • 2005
  • 2006
  • 2008
  • Crisis
  • 2009
  • 2010
Tariffs
  • 1789: Hamilton I
  • 1790: Hamilton II
  • 1792: Hamilton III
  • 1816: Dallas
  • 1824: Sectional
  • 1828: "Abominations"
  • 1832
  • 1833: Compromise
  • 1842: Black
  • 1846: Walker
  • 1857
  • 1861: Morrill
  • 1872
  • 1875
  • 1883: Mongrel
  • 1890: McKinley
  • 1894: Wilson–Gorman
  • 1897: Dingley
  • 1909: Payne-Aldrich
  • 1913: Underwood
  • 1921: Emergency
  • 1922: Fordney-McCumber
  • 1930: Smoot-Hawley
  • 1934: Reciprocal
  • 1948: GATT
  • 1962
  • 1974/75
  • 1979
  • 1984
  • 1988
  • 1988: Canada FT
  • 1993: NAFTA
  • 1994: WTO
  • 2002: Steel

Read more about this topic:  Excess Profits Tax

Famous quotes containing the word history:

    History, as an entirety, could only exist in the eyes of an observer outside it and outside the world. History only exists, in the final analysis, for God.
    Albert Camus (1913–1960)

    Let it suffice that in the light of these two facts, namely, that the mind is One, and that nature is its correlative, history is to be read and written.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    It may be well to remember that the highest level of moral aspiration recorded in history was reached by a few ancient Jews—Micah, Isaiah, and the rest—who took no count whatever of what might not happen to them after death. It is not obvious to me why the same point should not by and by be reached by the Gentiles.
    Thomas Henry Huxley (1825–95)