Email Forwarding - Historical Development of Email Forwarding

Historical Development of Email Forwarding

RFC 821, Simple Mail Transfer Protocol, by Jonathan B. Postel in 1982, provided for a forward-path for each recipient, in the form of, for example, @USC-ISIE.ARPA, @USC-ISIF.ARPA: Q-Smith@ISI-VAXA.ARPA — an optional list of hosts and a required destination-mailbox. When the list of hosts existed, it served as a source-route, indicating that each host had to relay the mail to the next host on the list. Otherwise, in the case of insufficient destination-information but where the server knew the correct destination, it could take the responsibility to deliver the message by responding as follows:

S: RCPT TO: R: 251 User not local; will forward to

The concept at that time envisaged the elements of the forward-path (source route) moving to the return-path (envelope sender) as a message got relayed from one SMTP server to another. Even if the system discouraged the use of source-routing, dynamically building the return-path implied that the "envelope sender" information could not remain in its original form during forwarding. Thus RFC 821 did not originally allow plain message-forwarding.

The introduction of the MX record made source-routing unnecessary. In 1989, RFC 1123 recommended accepting source-routing only for backward-compatibility. At that point, plain message forwarding became the recommended action for alias-expansion. In 2008, RFC 5321 still mentions that "systems may remove the return path and rebuild as needed", taking into consideration that not doing so might inadvertently disclose sensitive information. Actually, plain message-forwarding can be conveniently used for alias expansion within the same server or a set of coordinated servers.

Read more about this topic:  Email Forwarding

Famous quotes containing the words historical, development and/or forwarding:

    The proverbial notion of historical distance consists in our having lost ninety-five of every hundred original facts, so the remaining ones can be arranged however one likes.
    Robert Musil (1880–1942)

    The highest form of development is to govern one’s self.
    Zerelda G. Wallace (1817–1901)

    I was duped ... by the Secretary of the treasury [Alexander Hamilton], and made a fool for forwarding his schemes, not then sufficiently understood by me; and of all the errors of my political life, this has occasioned the deepest regret.
    Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826)