History of Divorce Law in Canada
There was no uniform federal divorce law in Canada until 1968. Instead, there was a patch-work of divorce laws in the different provinces, depending on the laws in force in each province at the time it joined Confederation:
- In the three Maritime provinces, divorce was governed by laws enacted by the colonial governments prior to Confederation in 1867;
- In the four western provinces and the northern territories, divorce was available under the English Matrimonial Causes Act, 1857, which was incorporated into their local law in 1870 under the principle of the reception of English statute laws in a colony;
- In Quebec and Newfoundland up to 1968, there was no divorce law. The only way for an individual to get divorced in these provinces was to apply to the federal Parliament for a private bill of divorce. These bills were primarily handled by the Canadian Senate where a special committee would undertake an investigation of a request for a divorce. If the committee found that the request had merit, the marriage would be dissolved by an Act of Parliament.
- In Ontario, prior to 1930 there was no divorce law and individuals seeking a divorce similarly had to apply to Parliament for a private bill of divorce. In 1930, Parliament passed the Divorce Act (Ontario) which authorised divorces in the courts of Ontario for Ontario residents.
In 1968, Parliament passed the first Divorce Act which established a uniform divorce law across Canada. The 1968 Act widened the reasons for divorce from adultery to include mental or physical cruelty, desertion, separation for three years or having an imprisoned spouse.
In 1986, Parliament passed a new Divorce Act to modernise the law of divorce further. One change made was to reduce the separation period to one year.
Read more about this topic: Divorce Act
Famous quotes containing the words history of, history, divorce, law and/or canada:
“Throughout the history of commercial life nobody has ever quite liked the commission man. His function is too vague, his presence always seems one too many, his profit looks too easy, and even when you admit that he has a necessary function, you feel that this function is, as it were, a personification of something that in an ethical society would not need to exist. If people could deal with one another honestly, they would not need agents.”
—Raymond Chandler (1888–1959)
“Every generation rewrites the past. In easy times history is more or less of an ornamental art, but in times of danger we are driven to the written record by a pressing need to find answers to the riddles of today.... In times of change and danger when there is a quicksand of fear under men’s reasoning, a sense of continuity with generations gone before can stretch like a lifeline across the scary present and get us past that idiot delusion of the exceptional Now that blocks good thinking.”
—John Dos Passos (1896–1970)
“Anybody who’s been through a divorce will tell you that at one point ... they’ve thought murder. The line between thinking murder and doing murder isn’t that major.”
—Oliver Stone (b. 1946)
“The so-called law of induction cannot possibly be a law of logic, since it is obviously a proposition with a sense.—Nor, therefore, can it be an a priori law.”
—Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951)
“I see Canada as a country torn between a very northern, rather extraordinary, mystical spirit which it fears and its desire to present itself to the world as a Scotch banker.”
—Robertson Davies (b. 1913)