History of Divorce Law in Canada
There was no uniform federal divorce law in Canada until 1968. Instead, there was a patch-work of divorce laws in the different provinces, depending on the laws in force in each province at the time it joined Confederation:
- In the three Maritime provinces, divorce was governed by laws enacted by the colonial governments prior to Confederation in 1867;
- In the four western provinces and the northern territories, divorce was available under the English Matrimonial Causes Act, 1857, which was incorporated into their local law in 1870 under the principle of the reception of English statute laws in a colony;
- In Quebec and Newfoundland up to 1968, there was no divorce law. The only way for an individual to get divorced in these provinces was to apply to the federal Parliament for a private bill of divorce. These bills were primarily handled by the Canadian Senate where a special committee would undertake an investigation of a request for a divorce. If the committee found that the request had merit, the marriage would be dissolved by an Act of Parliament.
- In Ontario, prior to 1930 there was no divorce law and individuals seeking a divorce similarly had to apply to Parliament for a private bill of divorce. In 1930, Parliament passed the Divorce Act (Ontario) which authorised divorces in the courts of Ontario for Ontario residents.
In 1968, Parliament passed the first Divorce Act which established a uniform divorce law across Canada. The 1968 Act widened the reasons for divorce from adultery to include mental or physical cruelty, desertion, separation for three years or having an imprisoned spouse.
In 1986, Parliament passed a new Divorce Act to modernise the law of divorce further. One change made was to reduce the separation period to one year.
Read more about this topic: Divorce Act
Famous quotes containing the words history, divorce, law and/or canada:
“You that would judge me do not judge alone
This book or that, come to this hallowed place
Where my friends’ portraits hang and look thereon;
Ireland’s history in their lineaments trace;
Think where man’s glory most begins and ends
And say my glory was I had such friends.”
—William Butler Yeats (1865–1939)
“Children of the same family, the same blood, with the same first associations and habits, have some means of enjoyment in their power, which no subsequent connections can supply; and it must be by a long and unnatural estrangement, by a divorce which no subsequent connection can justify, if such precious remains of the earliest attachments are ever entirely outlived.”
—Jane Austen (1775–1817)
“The image cannot be dispossessed of a primordial freshness, which idea can never claim. An idea is derivative and tamed. The image is in the natural or wild state, and it has to be discovered there, not put there, obeying its own law and none of ours. We think we can lay hold of image and take it captive, but the docile captive is not the real image but only the idea, which is the image with its character beaten out of it.”
—John Crowe Ransom (1888–1974)
“Though the words Canada East on the map stretch over many rivers and lakes and unexplored wildernesses, the actual Canada, which might be the colored portion of the map, is but a little clearing on the banks of the river, which one of those syllables would more than cover.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)