Disjunction Property Implies Existence Property
In 1974 Harvey Friedman proved that in any recursively enumerable extension of intuitionistic arithmetic, the converse of the above also holds. Throughout the following discussion assume is such an extension of arithmetic. Harvey Friedman's proof is quite intricate, making of self-referential sentences in a similar way to the one used in the proof of the incompleteness theorem. They key step is to find a bound on the existential quantifier because bounded existential formula can be written as a disjunction,
- .
However, given an arbitrary existential formula, can we hope to replace it by a bounded one?
Read more about this topic: Disjunction And Existence Properties
Famous quotes containing the words property, implies and/or existence:
“A lawyer’s dream of Heaven: Every man reclaimed his own property at the resurrection, and each tried to recover it from all his forefathers.”
—Samuel Butler (1835–1902)
“To insult a friend implies that you respect his masculinity enough to know he can take it without acting like a crybaby. The swapping of insults, like the fighting between brothers, becomes the seal of the male bonding.”
—Frank Pittman (20th century)
“This seems to be advanced as the surest basis for our belief in the existence of gods, that there is no race so uncivilized, no one in the world so barbarous that his mind has no inkling of a belief in gods.”
—Marcus Tullius Cicero (106–43 B.C.)