Dirac Equation in The Algebra of Physical Space - Relation With The Standard Form

Relation With The Standard Form

The spinor can be written in a null basis as


\Psi = \psi_{11} P_3 - \psi_{12} P_3 \mathbf{e}_1 + \psi_{21} \mathbf{e}_1 P_3 + \psi_{22} \bar{P}_3,

such that the representation of the spinor in terms of the Pauli matrices is


\Psi \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{11} & \psi_{12} \\ \psi_{21} & \psi_{22}
\end{pmatrix}
 \bar{\Psi}^\dagger \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{22}^* & -\psi_{21}^* \\ -\psi_{12}^* & \psi_{11}^*
\end{pmatrix}

The standard form of the Dirac equation can be recovered by decomposing the spinor in its right and left-handed spinor components, which are extracted with the help of the projector

such that

 \Psi_L = \bar{\Psi}^\dagger P_3
 \Psi_R = \Psi P_3^{ }

with the following matrix representation

 \Psi_L \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{22}^* & 0 \\ -\psi_{12}^* & 0
\end{pmatrix}
 \Psi_R \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{11} & 0 \\ \psi_{21} & 0
\end{pmatrix}

The Dirac equation can be also written as

Without electromagnetic interaction, the following equation is obtained from the two equivalent forms of the Dirac equation


\begin{pmatrix}
0 & i \bar{\partial}\\
i \partial & 0
\end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix} \bar{\Psi}^\dagger P_3 \\ \Psi P_3
\end{pmatrix}
= m
\begin{pmatrix} \bar{\Psi}^\dagger P_3 \\ \Psi P_3
\end{pmatrix}

so that


\begin{pmatrix}
0 & i \partial_0 + i\nabla \\
i \partial_0 - i \nabla & 0
\end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix} \Psi_L \\ \Psi_R
\end{pmatrix}
= m
\begin{pmatrix} \Psi_L \\ \Psi_R
\end{pmatrix}

or in matrix representation


i \left(
\begin{pmatrix}
0 & 1 \\
1 & 0
\end{pmatrix} \partial_0 +
\begin{pmatrix}
0 & \sigma \\
-\sigma & 0
\end{pmatrix} \cdot \nabla
\right)
\begin{pmatrix} \psi_L \\ \psi_R
\end{pmatrix}
= m
\begin{pmatrix} \psi_L \\ \psi_R
\end{pmatrix},

where the second column of the right and left spinors can be dropped by defining the single column chiral spinors as

 \psi_L \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{22}^* \\ -\psi_{12}^*
\end{pmatrix}
 \psi_R \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{11} \\ \psi_{21}
\end{pmatrix}

The standard relativistic covariant form of the Dirac equation in the Weyl representation can be easily identified 
i \gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu} \psi = m \psi,
such that

 \psi_= \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{22}^* \\ -\psi_{12}^* \\ \psi_{11} \\ \psi_{21}
\end{pmatrix}

Given two spinors and in APS and their respective spinors in the standard form as and, one can verify the following identity


\phi^\dagger \gamma^0 \psi = \langle \bar{\Phi}\Psi + (\bar{\Psi}\Phi)^\dagger \rangle_S
,

such that


\psi^\dagger \gamma^0 \psi = 2 \langle \bar{\Psi}\Psi \rangle_{S R}

Read more about this topic:  Dirac Equation In The Algebra Of Physical Space

Famous quotes containing the words relation, standard and/or form:

    Science is the language of the temporal world; love is that of the spiritual world. Man, indeed, describes more than he explains; while the angelic spirit sees and understands. Science saddens man; love enraptures the angel; science is still seeking, love has found. Man judges of nature in relation to itself; the angelic spirit judges of it in relation to heaven. In short to the spirits everything speaks.
    HonorĂ© De Balzac (1799–1850)

    I don’t have any problem with a reporter or a news person who says the President is uninformed on this issue or that issue. I don’t think any of us would challenge that. I do have a problem with the singular focus on this, as if that’s the only standard by which we ought to judge a president. What we learned in the last administration was how little having an encyclopedic grasp of all the facts has to do with governing.
    David R. Gergen (b. 1942)

    Our ideas are the offspring of our senses; we are not more able to create the form of a being we have not seen, without retrospect to one we know, than we are able to create a new sense. He whose fancy has conceived an idea of the most beautiful form must have composed it from actual existence.
    Henry Fuseli (1741–1825)