Dirac Equation in The Algebra of Physical Space - Relation With The Standard Form

Relation With The Standard Form

The spinor can be written in a null basis as

\Psi = \psi_{11} P_3 - \psi_{12} P_3 \mathbf{e}_1 + \psi_{21} \mathbf{e}_1 P_3 + \psi_{22} \bar{P}_3,

such that the representation of the spinor in terms of the Pauli matrices is

\Psi \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{11} & \psi_{12} \\ \psi_{21} & \psi_{22} \end{pmatrix}
\bar{\Psi}^\dagger \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{22}^* & -\psi_{21}^* \\ -\psi_{12}^* & \psi_{11}^* \end{pmatrix}

The standard form of the Dirac equation can be recovered by decomposing the spinor in its right and left-handed spinor components, which are extracted with the help of the projector

such that

\Psi_L = \bar{\Psi}^\dagger P_3
\Psi_R = \Psi P_3^{ }

with the following matrix representation

\Psi_L \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{22}^* & 0 \\ -\psi_{12}^* & 0 \end{pmatrix}
\Psi_R \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{11} & 0 \\ \psi_{21} & 0 \end{pmatrix}

The Dirac equation can be also written as

Without electromagnetic interaction, the following equation is obtained from the two equivalent forms of the Dirac equation

\begin{pmatrix} 0 & i \bar{\partial}\\ i \partial & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \bar{\Psi}^\dagger P_3 \\ \Psi P_3 \end{pmatrix} = m \begin{pmatrix} \bar{\Psi}^\dagger P_3 \\ \Psi P_3 \end{pmatrix}

so that

\begin{pmatrix} 0 & i \partial_0 + i\nabla \\ i \partial_0 - i \nabla & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \Psi_L \\ \Psi_R \end{pmatrix} = m \begin{pmatrix} \Psi_L \\ \Psi_R \end{pmatrix}

or in matrix representation

i \left( \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \partial_0 + \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \sigma \\ -\sigma & 0 \end{pmatrix} \cdot \nabla \right) \begin{pmatrix} \psi_L \\ \psi_R \end{pmatrix} = m \begin{pmatrix} \psi_L \\ \psi_R \end{pmatrix},

where the second column of the right and left spinors can be dropped by defining the single column chiral spinors as

\psi_L \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{22}^* \\ -\psi_{12}^* \end{pmatrix}
\psi_R \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{11} \\ \psi_{21} \end{pmatrix}

The standard relativistic covariant form of the Dirac equation in the Weyl representation can be easily identified i \gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu} \psi = m \psi, such that

\psi_= \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{22}^* \\ -\psi_{12}^* \\ \psi_{11} \\ \psi_{21} \end{pmatrix}

Given two spinors and in APS and their respective spinors in the standard form as and, one can verify the following identity

\phi^\dagger \gamma^0 \psi = \langle \bar{\Phi}\Psi + (\bar{\Psi}\Phi)^\dagger \rangle_S ,

such that

\psi^\dagger \gamma^0 \psi = 2 \langle \bar{\Psi}\Psi \rangle_{S R}

Read more about this topic:  Dirac Equation In The Algebra Of Physical Space

Famous quotes containing the words relation with, relation, standard and/or form:

    “There is a constant in the average American imagination and taste, for which the past must be preserved and celebrated in full-scale authentic copy; a philosophy of immortality as duplication. It dominates the relation with the self, with the past, not infrequently with the present, always with History and, even, with the European tradition.”
    —Umberto Eco (b. 1932)

    “... a worker was seldom so much annoyed by what he got as by what he got in relation to his fellow workers.”
    —Mary Barnett Gilson (1877–?)

    “Error is a supposition that pleasure and pain, that intelligence, substance, life, are existent in matter. Error is neither Mind nor one of Mind’s faculties. Error is the contradiction of Truth. Error is a belief without understanding. Error is unreal because untrue. It is that which seemeth to be and is not. If error were true, its truth would be error, and we should have a self-evident absurdity—namely, erroneous truth. Thus we should continue to lose the standard of Truth.”
    —Mary Baker Eddy (1821–1910)

    “Every idea is endowed of itself with immortal life, like a human being. All created form, even that which is created by man, is immortal. For form is independent of matter: molecules do not constitute form.”
    —Charles Baudelaire (1821–1867)