Dirac Equation in The Algebra of Physical Space - Relation With The Standard Form

Relation With The Standard Form

The spinor can be written in a null basis as

\Psi = \psi_{11} P_3 - \psi_{12} P_3 \mathbf{e}_1 + \psi_{21} \mathbf{e}_1 P_3 + \psi_{22} \bar{P}_3,

such that the representation of the spinor in terms of the Pauli matrices is

\Psi \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{11} & \psi_{12} \\ \psi_{21} & \psi_{22} \end{pmatrix}
\bar{\Psi}^\dagger \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{22}^* & -\psi_{21}^* \\ -\psi_{12}^* & \psi_{11}^* \end{pmatrix}

The standard form of the Dirac equation can be recovered by decomposing the spinor in its right and left-handed spinor components, which are extracted with the help of the projector

such that

\Psi_L = \bar{\Psi}^\dagger P_3
\Psi_R = \Psi P_3^{ }

with the following matrix representation

\Psi_L \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{22}^* & 0 \\ -\psi_{12}^* & 0 \end{pmatrix}
\Psi_R \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{11} & 0 \\ \psi_{21} & 0 \end{pmatrix}

The Dirac equation can be also written as

Without electromagnetic interaction, the following equation is obtained from the two equivalent forms of the Dirac equation

\begin{pmatrix} 0 & i \bar{\partial}\\ i \partial & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \bar{\Psi}^\dagger P_3 \\ \Psi P_3 \end{pmatrix} = m \begin{pmatrix} \bar{\Psi}^\dagger P_3 \\ \Psi P_3 \end{pmatrix}

so that

\begin{pmatrix} 0 & i \partial_0 + i\nabla \\ i \partial_0 - i \nabla & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \Psi_L \\ \Psi_R \end{pmatrix} = m \begin{pmatrix} \Psi_L \\ \Psi_R \end{pmatrix}

or in matrix representation

i \left( \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \partial_0 + \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \sigma \\ -\sigma & 0 \end{pmatrix} \cdot \nabla \right) \begin{pmatrix} \psi_L \\ \psi_R \end{pmatrix} = m \begin{pmatrix} \psi_L \\ \psi_R \end{pmatrix},

where the second column of the right and left spinors can be dropped by defining the single column chiral spinors as

\psi_L \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{22}^* \\ -\psi_{12}^* \end{pmatrix}
\psi_R \rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{11} \\ \psi_{21} \end{pmatrix}

The standard relativistic covariant form of the Dirac equation in the Weyl representation can be easily identified i \gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu} \psi = m \psi, such that

\psi_= \begin{pmatrix} \psi_{22}^* \\ -\psi_{12}^* \\ \psi_{11} \\ \psi_{21} \end{pmatrix}

Given two spinors and in APS and their respective spinors in the standard form as and, one can verify the following identity

\phi^\dagger \gamma^0 \psi = \langle \bar{\Phi}\Psi + (\bar{\Psi}\Phi)^\dagger \rangle_S ,

such that

\psi^\dagger \gamma^0 \psi = 2 \langle \bar{\Psi}\Psi \rangle_{S R}

Read more about this topic:  Dirac Equation In The Algebra Of Physical Space

Famous quotes containing the words relation with the, relation with, relation, standard and/or form:

    “There is a constant in the average American imagination and taste, for which the past must be preserved and celebrated in full-scale authentic copy; a philosophy of immortality as duplication. It dominates the relation with the self, with the past, not infrequently with the present, always with History and, even, with the European tradition.”
    —Umberto Eco (b. 1932)

    “There is a constant in the average American imagination and taste, for which the past must be preserved and celebrated in full-scale authentic copy; a philosophy of immortality as duplication. It dominates the relation with the self, with the past, not infrequently with the present, always with History and, even, with the European tradition.”
    —Umberto Eco (b. 1932)

    “We must get back into relation, vivid and nourishing relation to the cosmos and the universe. The way is through daily ritual, and is an affair of the individual and the household, a ritual of dawn and noon and sunset, the ritual of the kindling fire and pouring water, the ritual of the first breath, and the last.”
    —D.H. (David Herbert)

    “The urge for Chinese food is always unpredictable: famous for no occasion, standard fare for no holiday, and the constant as to demand is either whim, the needy plebiscite of instantly famished drunks, or pregnancy.”
    —Alexander Theroux (b. 1940)

    “Nihilism as a symptom that the losers have no more consolation: that they destroy in order to be destroyed, that without morality they no longer have any reason to “resign themselves”Mthat they put themselves on the level of the opposite principle and for their part also want power in that they compel the mighty to be their hangmen. This is the European form of Buddhism, renunciation, once all existence has lost its “meaning.””
    —Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900)