Running Time
An upper bound of the running time of Dijkstra's algorithm on a graph with edges and vertices can be expressed as a function of and using big-O notation.
For any implementation of vertex set the running time is in, where and are times needed to perform decrease key and extract minimum operations in set, respectively.
The simplest implementation of the Dijkstra's algorithm stores vertices of set in an ordinary linked list or array, and extract minimum from is simply a linear search through all vertices in . In this case, the running time is .
For sparse graphs, that is, graphs with far fewer than edges, Dijkstra's algorithm can be implemented more efficiently by storing the graph in the form of adjacency lists and using a binary heap, pairing heap, or Fibonacci heap as a priority queue to implement extracting minimum efficiently. With a binary heap, the algorithm requires time (which is dominated by, assuming the graph is connected). To avoid O(|V|) look-up in decrease-key step on a vanilla binary heap, it is necessary to maintain a supplementary index mapping each vertex to the heap's index (and keep it up to date as priority queue changes), making it take only time instead. The Fibonacci heap improves this to .
Note that for directed acyclic graphs, it is possible to find shortest paths from a given starting vertex in linear time, by processing the vertices in a topological order, and calculating the path length for each vertex to be the minimum length obtained via any of its incoming edges.
Read more about this topic: Dijkstra's Algorithm
Famous quotes containing the words running and/or time:
“The shallowest still water is unfathomable. Wherever the trees and skies are reflected, there is more than Atlantic depth, and no danger of fancy running aground.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“What is clear is that Christianity directed increased attention to childhood. For the first time in history it seemed important to decide what the moral status of children was. In the midst of this sometimes excessive concern, a new sympathy for children was promoted. Sometimes this meant criticizing adults. . . . So far as parents were put on the defensive in this way, the beginning of the Christian era marks a revolution in the child’s status.”
—C. John Sommerville (20th century)