Discussion Topics When Setting Up An Experimental Design
When you want to set up an experimental design or randomized clinical trial there are a couple of things that need to be thought of before actually doing the experiment . An experimental design is the laying out of a detailed experimental plan in advance of doing the experiment. Some of the following topics have already been discussed in the principals of experimental design section.
1. How many factors will the design have? and are the levels of these factors fixed or random?
2. Are control conditions needed, and what should they be?
3. Manipulation checks; did the manipulation really work?
4. Background variables.
5. Sample size. How many units need to be collected for the experiment to be generalisable and have enough power?
6. The relevance of interactions between factors.
7. The occurrence of delayed effects of substantive factors on outcomes.
8. The occurrence of response shifts in self-report measures.
9. The feasibility of repeated administration of the same measurement instruments to the same units at different occasions, with a post-test and follow-up tests.
10. The use of a proxy pretest.
11. Blocking variables.
12. Blinding. Should the client/patient, researcher or even the analyst of the data be blind to conditions?
13. The feasibility of subsequent application of different conditions to the same units.
Read more about this topic: Design Of Experiments
Famous quotes containing the words discussion, setting, experimental and/or design:
“There are answers which, in turning away wrath, only send it to the other end of the room, and to have a discussion coolly waived when you feel that justice is all on your own side is even more exasperating in marriage than in philosophy.”
—George Eliot [Mary Ann (or Marian)
“Dandyism is the last flicker of heroism in decadent ages.... Dandyism is a setting sun; like the declining star, it is magnificent, without heat and full of melancholy. But alas! the rising tide of democracy, which spreads everywhere and reduces everything to the same level, is daily carrying away these last champions of human pride, and submerging, in the waters of oblivion, the last traces of these remarkable myrmidons.”
—Charles Baudelaire (1821–1867)
“The very hope of experimental philosophy, its expectation of constructing the sciences into a true philosophy of nature, is based on induction, or, if you please, the a priori presumption, that physical causation is universal; that the constitution of nature is written in its actual manifestations, and needs only to be deciphered by experimental and inductive research; that it is not a latent invisible writing, to be brought out by the magic of mental anticipation or metaphysical mediation.”
—Chauncey Wright (1830–1875)
“For I choose that my remembrances of him should be pleasing, affecting, religious. I will love him as a glorified friend, after the free way of friendship, and not pay him a stiff sign of respect, as men do to those whom they fear. A passage read from his discourses, a moving provocation to works like his, any act or meeting which tends to awaken a pure thought, a flow of love, an original design of virtue, I call a worthy, a true commemoration.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)