Actor Fixed Point Semantics
The denotational theory of computational system semantics is concerned with finding mathematical objects that represent what systems do. Collections of such objects are called domains. The Actor uses the domain of event diagram scenarios. It is usual to assume some properties of the domain, such as the existence of limits of chains (see cpo) and a bottom element. Various additional properties are often reasonable and helpful: the article on domain theory has more details.
A domain is typically a partial order, which can be understood as an order of definedness. For instance, given event diagram scenarios x and y, one might let "x≤y" mean that "y extends the computations x".
The mathematical denotation denoted by a system S is found by constructing increasingly better approximations from an initial empty denotation called ⊥S using some denotation approximating function progressionS to construct a denotation (meaning ) for S as follows:
-
- DenoteS ≡ ⊔i∈ω progressionSi(⊥S).
It would be expected that progressionS would be monotone, i.e., if x≤y then progressionS(x)≤progressionS(y). More generally, we would expect that
-
- If ∀i∈ω xi≤xi+1, then progressionS(⊔i∈ω xi) = ⊔i∈ω progressionS(xi)
This last stated property of progressionS is called ω-continuity.
A central question of denotational semantics is to characterize when it is possible to create denotations (meanings) according to the equation for DenoteS. A fundamental theorem of computational domain theory is that if progressionS is ω-continuous then DenoteS will exist.
It follows from the ω-continuity of progressionS that
-
-
- progressionS(DenoteS) = DenoteS
-
The above equation motivates the terminology that DenoteS is a fixed point of progressionS.
Furthermore this fixed point is least among all fixed points of progressionS.
Read more about this topic: Denotational Semantics Of The Actor Model
Famous quotes containing the words actor, fixed and/or point:
“The actor should not play a part. Like the Aeolian harps that used to be hung in the trees to be played only by the breeze, the actor should be an instrument played upon by the character he depicts.”
—Alla Nazimova (18791945)
“The whole point about the true unconscious is that it is all the time moving forward, beyond the range of its own fixed laws or habits. It is no good trying to superimpose an ideal nature upon the unconscious.”
—D.H. (David Herbert)
“Any historian of the literature of the modern age will take virtually for granted the adversary intention, the actually subversive intention, that characterizes modern writinghe will perceive its clear purpose of detaching the reader from the habits of thought and feeling that the larger culture imposes, of giving him a ground and a vantage point from which to judge and condemn, and perhaps revise, the culture that produces him.”
—Lionel Trilling (19051975)