David Buss - Short Vs. Long-Term Mating Strategies

Short Vs. Long-Term Mating Strategies

One element of David Buss’ research involves studying the differences in mate selection between short-term and long-term mating strategies. Individuals differ in their preferences for either a short or long-term mating strategy (i.e. whether looking for a “hook-up” or a serious relationship). The Gangestad and Simpson Sociosexual Orientation Inventory determines whether a person favors a short-term or long-term strategy (also termed as unrestricted and restricted). Higher SOI scores indicate a less restricted orientation, and thus a preference for a short-term mating strategy.

David Buss and colleagues conducted a study that attempted to uncover where priorities lie in short and long-term mating strategies concerning determinants of attractiveness. In order to do this, participants’ mating strategies were determined using the Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (SOI), labeling each participant as favoring either a short or long-term mating strategy. Each individual was then given the choice to reveal either the face or body from a portrait of a person of the opposite gender. David Buss and his colleagues found that sociosexual orientation/favored mating strategy influenced which part of the portrait was revealed. Men who favored a short-term mating strategy revealed the woman’s body, whereas men who favored a long-term mating strategy revealed the woman’s face. David Buss and his colleagues found that favored mating strategies in women had no correlation with which part of the portrait was revealed. Attractiveness, from a male’s perspective, seems to be based on facial cues when seeking a long-term relationship, and bodily cues when seeking a short-term relationship. This finding adds to David Buss’ field of research by demonstrating differences in mating strategies across preferred relationship type.

Read more about this topic:  David Buss

Famous quotes containing the words short, long-term, mating and/or strategies:

    Hemingway is terribly limited. His technique is good for short stories, for people who meet once in a bar very late at night, but do not enter into relations. But not for the novel.
    —W.H. (Wystan Hugh)

    Attachment to a baby is a long-term process, not a single, magical moment. The opportunity for bonding at birth may be compared to falling in love—staying in love takes longer and demands more work.
    T. Berry Brazelton (20th century)

    The elephant, not only the largest but the most intelligent of animals, provides us with an excellent example. It is faithful and tenderly loving to the female of its choice, mating only every third year and then for no more than five days, and so secretly as never to be seen, until, on the sixth day, it appears and goes at once to wash its whole body in the river, unwilling to return to the herd until thus purified. Such good and modest habits are an example to husband and wife.
    St. Francis De Sales (1567–1622)

    By intervening in the Vietnamese struggle the United States was attempting to fit its global strategies into a world of hillocks and hamlets, to reduce its majestic concerns for the containment of communism and the security of the Free World to a dimension where governments rose and fell as a result of arguments between two colonels’ wives.
    Frances Fitzgerald (b. 1940)