Critical Assumption Planning - Critical Assumption Identification

Critical Assumption Identification

During this step the assumptions are identified and there is a determination of criticality. The hardest part of CAP is to identify the assumptions that are not written down.

In order to determine the criticality of the assumptions, they need to be quantified; it is then possible to put the financial results in a spreadsheet and link them together. These financial impacts will change for the various assumptions.

CAP measures the criticality of an assumption as a change in the net present value of a venture (NPV). To determine criticality each assumption is assigned a range of uncertainty: base case, best and worst case. Then, assumption for assumption, while keeping the other assumptions at base case, the NPV changes for each assumption in the worst and best case scenarios are checked.

The NPV analysis proves the company with information about the criticality of an assumption. Two signals strongly indicate a critical assumption: a big difference in NPV between the best and worst-case scenarios, or a huge loss of NPV in the worst-case scenario

Read more about this topic:  Critical Assumption Planning

Famous quotes containing the words critical and/or assumption:

    The critical period in matrimony is breakfast-time.
    —A.P. (Sir Alan Patrick)

    The truth is, the whole administration under Roosevelt was demoralized by the system of dealing directly with subordinates. It was obviated in the State Department and the War Department under [Secretary of State Elihu] Root and me [Taft was the Secretary of War], because we simply ignored the interference and went on as we chose.... The subordinates gained nothing by his assumption of authority, but it was not so in the other departments.
    William Howard Taft (1857–1930)