Coxeter Group - Definition

Definition

Formally, a Coxeter group can be defined as a group with the presentation

where and for . The condition means no relation of the form should be imposed.

The pair (W,S) where W is a Coxeter group with generators S={r1,...,rn} is called Coxeter system. Note that in general S is not uniquely determined by W. For example, the Coxeter groups of type BC3 and A1xA3 are isomorphic but the Coxeter systems are not equivalent (see below for an explanation of this notation).

A number of conclusions can be drawn immediately from the above definition.

  • The relation mi i = 1 means that (riri )1 = (ri )2 = 1 for all i ; the generators are involutions.
  • If mi j = 2, then the generators ri and rj commute. This follows by observing that
xx = yy = 1,
together with
xyxy = 1
implies that
xy = x(xyxy)y = (xx)yx(yy) = yx.
Alternatively, since the generators are involutions, so, and thus is equal to the commutator.
  • In order to avoid redundancy among the relations, it is necessary to assume that mi j = mj i. This follows by observing that
yy = 1,
together with
(xy)m = 1
implies that
(yx)m = (yx)myy = y(xy)my = yy = 1.
Alternatively, and are conjugate elements, as .

Read more about this topic:  Coxeter Group

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    It’s a rare parent who can see his or her child clearly and objectively. At a school board meeting I attended . . . the only definition of a gifted child on which everyone in the audience could agree was “mine.”
    Jane Adams (20th century)

    Mothers often are too easily intimidated by their children’s negative reactions...When the child cries or is unhappy, the mother reads this as meaning that she is a failure. This is why it is so important for a mother to know...that the process of growing up involves by definition things that her child is not going to like. Her job is not to create a bed of roses, but to help him learn how to pick his way through the thorns.
    Elaine Heffner (20th century)

    Was man made stupid to see his own stupidity?
    Is God by definition indifferent, beyond us all?
    Is the eternal truth man’s fighting soul
    Wherein the Beast ravens in its own avidity?
    Richard Eberhart (b. 1904)