Convolution Theorem - Proof

Proof

The proof here is shown for a particular normalisation of the Fourier transform. As mentioned above, if the transform is normalised differently, then constant scaling factors will appear in the derivation.

Let f, g belong to L1(Rn). Let be the Fourier transform of and be the Fourier transform of :

where the dot between x and ν indicates the inner product of Rn. Let be the convolution of and

Now notice that

Hence by Fubini's theorem we have that so its Fourier transform is defined by the integral formula

\begin{align} H(\nu) = \mathcal{F}\{h\} &= \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} h(z) e^{-2 \pi i z\cdot\nu}\, dz \\ &= \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} f(x) g(z-x)\, dx\, e^{-2 \pi i z\cdot \nu}\, dz. \end{align}

Observe that and hence by the argument above we may apply Fubini's theorem again (i.e. interchange the order of integration):

Substitute ; then, so:

These two integrals are the definitions of and, so:

QED.

Read more about this topic:  Convolution Theorem

Famous quotes containing the word proof:

    “A short letter to a distant friend is, in my opinion, an insult like that of a slight bow or cursory salutation—a proof of unwillingness to do much, even where there is a necessity of doing something.”
    —Samuel Johnson (1709–1784)

    “If we view our children as stupid, naughty, disturbed, or guilty of their misdeeds, they will learn to behold themselves as foolish, faulty, or shameful specimens of humanity. They will regard us as judges from whom they wish to hide, and they will interpret everything we say as further proof of their unworthiness. If we view them as innocent, or at least merely ignorant, they will gain understanding from their experiences, and they will continue to regard us as wise partners.”
    —Polly Berrien Berends (20th century)

    “O, popular applause! what heart of man
    Is proof against thy sweet, seducing charms?”
    —William Cowper (1731–1800)