Classical Orthogonal Polynomials - Definition

Definition

In general, the orthogonal polynomials Pn with respect to a weight W:R→R+ on the real line are defined by

\begin{align} &\deg P_n = n~, \quad n = 0,1,2,\ldots\\ &\int P_m(x) \, P_n(x) \, W(x)\,dx = 0~, \quad m \neq n~. \end{align}

The relations above define Pn up to multiplication by a number. Various normalisations are used to fix the constant, e.g.

The classical orthogonal polynomials correspond to the three families of weights:

\begin{align} \text{(Jacobi)}\quad &W(x) = \begin{cases} (1 - x)^\alpha (1+x)^\beta~, & -1 \leq x \leq 1 \\ 0~, &\text{otherwise} \end{cases} \\ \text{(Hermite)}\quad &W(x) = \exp(- x^2) \\ \text{(Laguerre)}\quad &W(x) = \begin{cases} x^\alpha \exp(- x)~, &\quad x \geq 0 \\ 0~, &\text{otherwise} \end{cases} \end{align}

The standard normalisation (also called standardization) is detailed below.

Read more about this topic:  Classical Orthogonal Polynomials

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    “The physicians say, they are not materialists; but they are:MSpirit is matter reduced to an extreme thinness: O so thin!—But the definition of spiritual should be, that which is its own evidence. What notions do they attach to love! what to religion! One would not willingly pronounce these words in their hearing, and give them the occasion to profane them.”
    —Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    “Was man made stupid to see his own stupidity?
    Is God by definition indifferent, beyond us all?
    Is the eternal truth man’s fighting soul
    Wherein the Beast ravens in its own avidity?”
    —Richard Eberhart (b. 1904)

    “... if, as women, we accept a philosophy of history that asserts that women are by definition assimilated into the male universal, that we can understand our past through a male lens—if we are unaware that women even have a history—we live our lives similarly unanchored, drifting in response to a veering wind of myth and bias.”
    —Adrienne Rich (b. 1929)