Cisgenesis

Cisgenesis, sometimes also called intragenesis, is a product designation for a category of genetically engineered plants. A variety of classification schemes have been proposed that order genetically modified organisms based on the nature of introduced genotypical changes, rather than the process of genetic engineering.

Cisgenesis (from "same" and "beginning") is one term for organisms that have been engineered using a process in which genes are artificially transferred between organisms that could otherwise be conventionally bred. Unlike in transgenesis, genes are only transferred between closely related organisms. The term was first used in a PhD thesis by Jan Schaart of Wageningen University in 2004, discussing making strawberries less susceptible to Botrytis cinerea.

In Europe, currently, this process is governed by the same laws as transgenesis but researchers at Wageningen University in the Netherlands feel that this should be changed and regulated in the same way as conventionally bred plants. However, other scientists, writing in Nature Biotechnology, have disagreed writing, "Although lowering regulatory hurdles may increase profits in the short term, it could place the long-term potential of improved agriculture through GE in jeopardy. We would prefer to see plant molecular biologists focus their attention on developing more sophisticated methodologies such as a targeted gene knock-in strategy or genomics-assisted breeding rather than on schemes to evade regulatory mechanisms with products that are still generated by relatively crude transgenic technology." In 2012 the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) issued a report with their risk assessment of cisgenic and intragenic plants. They compared the hazards associated with plants produced by cisgenesis and intragenesis with those obtained either by conventional plant breeding techniques or transgenesis. The EFSA concluded that "similar hazards can be associated with cisgenic and conventionally bred plants, while novel hazards can be associated with intragenic and transgenic plants." They concluded that the existing European guidelines for risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified plants and the guidelines on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants were applicable for the evaluation of food and feed products derived from cisgenic and intragenic plants and did not need to be developed further.

Cisgenesis and transgenesis use artificial gene transfer, which results in far less change to an organism's genes than mutagenesis, which was widely used before genetic engineering was developed.

Some people believe that cisgenesis should not face as much regulatory oversight as genetic modification through transgenesis. Cisgenesis differs from conventional breeding because it can potentially create new varieties of crops more quickly and cheaply and only selected beneficial genes are transferred and not other genes nearby on the chromosome. In conventional breeding, multiple backcrosses must be performed, each taking at least several months, to create a new cultivar. Cisgenesis can achieve the same results in a fraction of the time. One application of cisgenesis is to create blight resistant potato plants by taking resistance from wild varieties and transferring them into high yielding varieties.

Read more about Cisgenesis:  Related Classification Scheme, Diagram