Philosophy
The mission can be achieved only through a consistent and continuing regard for two basic principles. Firstly, the Centre strives to maintain objectivity and credibility, to remain independent of any government or non-government body and to be partial to no political party or private concern. The Centre therefore makes every effort to ensure that work is conducted in an unbiased manner, regardless of the opinions of sponsors or self-interest. Secondly, the Centre seeks extensive collaboration with similar organisations as well as with industry, academia and government. The Centre believes that the study of today's complex issues demands the widest variety of contributions from many perspectives, each of which adds to the overall understanding of an issue. It acknowledges the importance of the defence and security debates in the United States of America and Europe and embraces those relationships through bilateral initiatives, activities and affiliations. It also seeks to look at wider international perspectives reflecting, for example, the rise of India and China. CDiSS thus deliberately adopts a collaborative approach. CDiSS strives to break down the "stovepipes" between government and business and, by so doing, to enjoy a reputation at the leading edge of the security debate. CDiSS therefore includes within its programmes, experts in many disciplines and leaders from business, government and academia. It seeks to create an environment that promotes exchange of information, innovative thinking and analytical development. The Centre aspires to become the premier national institution within its discipline.
Read more about this topic: Centre For Defence And International Security Studies
Famous quotes containing the word philosophy:
“[The Settlement House] must be grounded in a philosophy whose foundation is on the solidarity of the human race, a philosophy which will not waver when the race happens to be represented by a drunken woman or an idiot boy.”
—Jane Addams (1860–1935)
“Why it was that upon this beautiful feminine tissue, sensitive as gossamer, and practically blank as snow as yet, there should have been traced such a coarse pattern as it was doomed to receive; why so often the coarse appropriates the finer thus, the wrong man the woman, the wrong women the man, many years of analytical philosophy have failed to explain to our sense of order.”
—Thomas Hardy (1840–1928)
“The new statement will comprise the skepticisms, as well as the faiths of society, and out of unbeliefs a creed shall be formed. For, skepticisms are not gratuitous or lawless, but are limitations of the affirmative statement, and the new philosophy must take them in, and make affirmations outside of them, just as much as must include the oldest beliefs.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)