California Proposition 64 (2004)
| State government |
|---|
| Gubernatorial elections |
|
1861 · 1906 · 1910 · 1914 · 1918 · 1922 |
| Lieutenant governor elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 |
| Secretary of State elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 · 2014 |
| Controller elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 |
| Treasurer elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 |
| Attorney General elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 |
| Insurance Comm. elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 · 2010 |
| SPI elections |
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 |
| Legislature |
|---|
| State Senate elections |
|
1992 · 1994 · 1996 · 1998 · 2000 · 2002 |
| State Assembly elections |
|
1992 · 1994 · 1996 · 1998 · 2000 · 2002 |
| Judicial |
|---|
|
1994 · 1998 · 2002 · 2006 |
| Propositions | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full list | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
| Elections by year |
|---|
| State elections |
|
Nov 1992 · Nov 1994 · Nov 1996 · Nov 1998 |
| Primary elections |
|
2000: Democratic · Republican |
| Los Angeles |
|---|
| Mayoral elections |
|
1993 · 1997 · 2001 · 2005 · 2009 · 2013 |
| City Attorney elections |
|
2009 |
| San Diego |
|---|
| Mayoral elections |
|
2012 |
| San Francisco |
|---|
| Mayoral elections |
|
1975 · 1979 · 1983 · 1987 · 1991 · 1995 |
| Board of Supervisors elections |
|
1977 · 1996 · 1998 · 2000 · 2002 · 2004 |
| General elections |
|
Mar 2004 · Nov 2004 · Nov 2005 · Jun 2006 |
- view
- talk
- edit
Proposition 64 was a California ballot proposition on the November 2, 2004 ballot. It passed with 6,571,694 (59.0%) votes in favor and 4,578,725 (41.0%) against. It was an initiative statute that limited the California law on unfair competition, restricting private lawsuits against a company only to those where an individual is actually injured by and suffers a financial loss due to an unfair, unlawful, or fraudulent business practice and providing that otherwise only public prosecutors may file lawsuits charging unfair business practices.
Proponents argued that the measure would limit "frivolous lawsuits" against companies, which they claimed result mainly in a windfall for lawyers rather than consumers. Proponents also argued that businesses ultimately must pass along their costs in the form of higher prices to consumers.
Opponents charged that the proposition was heavily funded by businesses who wanted to weaken consumer rights by limiting Californians' ability to enforce environmental, public health, and consumer protection laws such as 1986's Proposition 65.
Read more about California Proposition 64 (2004): Official Summary
Famous quotes containing the words california and/or proposition:
“The attraction and superiority of California are in its days. It has better days & more of them, than any other country.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)
“Truth exists. The sole purpose of this proposition is to assert the existence of truth against imbeciles and sceptics.”
—Edward Herbert Of Cherbury, Lord (1583–1648)