Bayesian Analysis
Following classical probability arguments, we consider a large Urn containing two children. We assume equal probability that either is a boy or a girl. The three discernible cases are thus: 1. both are girls (GG) - with probability P(GG) = 0.25, 2. both are boys (BB) - with probability of P(BB) = 0.25, and 3. one of each (G.B) - with probability of P(G.B) = 0.50. These are the prior probabilities.
Now we add the additional assumption that "at least one is a girl" = G. Using Bayes Theorem, we find
P(GG|G) = P(G|GG) * P(GG) / P(G) = 1 * 1/4 / 3/4 = 1/3.
where P(A|B) means "probability of A given B". P(G|GG) = probability of at least one girl given both are girls = 1. P(GG) = probability of both girls = 1/4 from the prior distribution. P(G) = probability of at least one being a girl, which includes cases GG and G.B = 1/4 + 1/2 = 3/4.
Note that, although the natural assumption seems to be a probability of 1/2, so the derived value of 1/3 seems low, the actual "normal" value for P(GG) is 1/4, so the 1/3 is actually a bit higher.
The paradox arises because the second assumption is somewhat artificial, and when describing the problem in an actual setting things get a bit sticky. Just how do we know that "at least" one is a girl? One description of the problem states that we look into a window, see only one child and it is a girl. Sounds like the same assumption...but...this one is equivalent to "sampling" the distribution (i.e. removing one child from the urn, ascertaining that it is a girl, then replacing). Let's call the statement "the sample is a girl" proposition "g". Now we have:
P(GG|g) = P(g|GG) * P(GG) / P(g) = 1 * 1/4 / 1/2 = 1/2.
The difference here is the P(g), which is just the probability of drawing a girl from all possible cases (i.e. without the "at least"), which is clearly 0.5.
The Bayesian analysis generalizes easily to the case in which we relax the 50/50 population assumption. If we have no information about the populations then we assume a "flat prior", i.e. P(BB) = P(GG) = P(G.B) = 1/3. In this case the "at least" assumption produces the result P(GG|G) = 1/2, and the sampling assumption produces P(GG|g) = 2/3, a result also derivable from the Rule of Succession.
Read more about this topic: Boy Or Girl Paradox
Famous quotes containing the word analysis:
“Whatever else American thinkers do, they psychologize, often brilliantly. The trouble is that psychology only takes us so far. The new interest in families has its merits, but it will have done us all a disservice if it turns us away from public issues to private matters. A vision of things that has no room for the inner life is bankrupt, but a psychology without social analysis or politics is both powerless and very lonely.”
—Joseph Featherstone (20th century)