Bids For The 2014 Winter Olympics - Applicant Cities Comparison

Applicant Cities Comparison

2014 Applicant Cities
Category Details Sochi
Russia
Salzburg
Austria
Jaca
Spain
Almaty
Kazakhstan
Pyeongchang
South Korea
Sofia
Bulgaria
Borjomi
Georgia
Population City (2005) 333,267 149,997 12,322 1,185,696 45,482 1,090,295 13,725
Country (2005) 143,420,309 8,184,691 40,341,462 15,185,844 48,294,134 7,450,349 4,677,401
Public opinion, support City 84% 60% 91% 83% 97% 81%
Country 53% 72% 85% 92% 74% 86%
Bid budget (million US$) Phase I 10.0 2.7 1.3 4.0 5.0 0.5 2.2
Phase II 17.5 5.1 10.7 16.0 16.0 12.5 5.0
Main airport,
2005/2014
Name Sochi International Salzburg Airport Zaragoza Airport Almaty International Incheon International Sofia International Tbilisi International
Distance (km) 6 5 156 22 241 10 203
Runways 2/2 1 2 1/2 2/3 1 2/2
Terminals 1/2 2 1/2 1/2
Gates 8/27 18 3 44/74 7 2/6
Cap./year 215,213 1,650,000/3,000,000 2,000,000/4,000,000
Cap./day 40,000 24,000/48,000
Cap./hour 1,200/2,500 12,000/17,253 /2,000
Longest distance* km 86 83 180 61 124 156 199
min 94 65 150 93 76 135 196

*Airports not included

Note: the cities are listed in the presentation order defined by the IOC during its Executive Board of October 26, 2005.

Read more about this topic:  Bids For The 2014 Winter Olympics

Famous quotes containing the words applicant, cities and/or comparison:

    We have two kinds of “conference.” One is that to which the office boy refers when he tells the applicant for a job that Mr. Blevitch is “in conference.” This means that Mr. Blevitch is in good health and reading the paper, but otherwise unoccupied. The other type of “conference” is bona fide in so far as it implies that three or four men are talking together in one room, and don’t want to be disturbed.
    Robert Benchley (1889–1945)

    Whilst we want cities as the centres where the best things are found, cities degrade us by magnifying trifles.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    The comparison between Coleridge and Johnson is obvious in so far as each held sway chiefly by the power of his tongue. The difference between their methods is so marked that it is tempting, but also unnecessary, to judge one to be inferior to the other. Johnson was robust, combative, and concrete; Coleridge was the opposite. The contrast was perhaps in his mind when he said of Johnson: “his bow-wow manner must have had a good deal to do with the effect produced.”
    Virginia Woolf (1882–1941)