Manuscript Tradition
The first mention of the work is by Photius. The work was almost lost in the 13th century, surviving in one now-incomplete manuscript, which was copied for Cardinal Bessarion in the 15th century; from Bessarion's copy the other surviving manuscripts depend.
Unfortunately the Bibliotheca has come down to us incomplete. It is undivided in the manuscripts but conventionally divided in three books. Part of the third book, which breaks off abruptly in the story of Theseus, has been lost. The Patriarch Photius had the full work before him, as he mentions in his "account of books read" that it contained stories of the heroes of the Trojan War and the nostoi, missing in surviving manuscripts. Sir James George Frazer published an epitome of the book by conflating two manuscript summaries of the text, which included the lost part.
Read more about this topic: Bibliotheca (Pseudo-Apollodorus)
Other articles related to "manuscript tradition, manuscripts, manuscript, tradition":
... a longer one, usually denoted A, which survives in three manuscripts, and a shorter one, usually called B, which is represented by the majority of the manuscript tradition ...
... Symmachus and one speech by Ausonius.) Only one manuscript of the Panegyrici Latini has survived into the 15th century, when it was discovered in 1433 in a monastery in Mainz, Germany by Johannes Aurispa ... That manuscript, known as M (Moguntinus), was copied several times before it was lost ... Two branches of Italian manuscripts derive from a copy Aurispa made of M, X1 and X2 ...
... Word Medieval and Renaissance Illuminated Manuscripts at the New York Public Library ... (1988) Calligraphy Today Twentieth Century Tradition Practice ... (1976) Calligraphy Today A Survey of Tradition and Trends ...
Famous quotes containing the words tradition and/or manuscript:
“Almost always tradition is nothing but a record and a machine-made imitation of the habits that our ancestors created. The average conservative is a slave to the most incidental and trivial part of his forefathers’ glory—to the archaic formula which happened to express their genius or the eighteenth-century contrivance by which for a time it was served.”
—Walter Lippmann (1889–1974)
“The manuscript lay like a dust-rag on his desk, and Eitel found, as he had found before, that the difficulty of art was that it forced a man back on his life, and each time the task was more difficult and distasteful.”
—Norman Mailer (b. 1923)