Comparison To Other Video Formats
Below is a list of modern, digital-style resolutions (and traditional analog "TV lines per picture height" measurements) for various media. The list only includes popular formats. All values are approximate NTSC resolutions. For PAL systems, replace "480" with "576". Note that listed resolution applies to luminance only, with chroma resolution usually half of that for digital formats, and significantly lower for analog formats.
Resolution based on the quality with a standard Kell factor of 0.7:
- 350×480 (250 lines per picture height): Umatic, Betamax, VHS, Video8
- 420×480 (300 lines per picture height): Super Betamax, Betacam (professional)
- 460×480 (330 lines per picture height): Analog Broadcast
- 590×480 (420 lines per picture height): LaserDisc, Super VHS, Hi8
- 700×480 (500 lines per picture height): Extended Definition Betamax
Digital formats Quality based on the resolution with a standard Kell factor of 0.7:
- 352×240 (240 lines per picture height): Video CD
- 480×480 (330 lines per picture height): SVCD
- 720×480 (504 lines per picture height): 4:3 DVD, Anamorphic Widescreen DVD, DV, miniDV, Digital8
- 720×360 (504 lines per picture height): Letterbox Widescreen DVD
- 1280×720 (896 lines per picture height): AVCHD-lite (720p)
- 1440×1080 (1008 lines per picture height): miniDV (high-def variant)
- 1920×1080 (1344 lines per picture height): (1080i/p) AVCHD, Blu-ray, HD DVD
Read more about this topic: Betamax, Home and Professional Recording, New Standards: SuperBetamax and Extended Definition Betamax
Famous quotes containing the words comparison to other, comparison and/or video:
“It is very important not to become hard. The artist must always have one skin too few in comparison to other people, so you feel the slightest wind.”
—Shusha Guppy (b. 1938)
“The comparison between Coleridge and Johnson is obvious in so far as each held sway chiefly by the power of his tongue. The difference between their methods is so marked that it is tempting, but also unnecessary, to judge one to be inferior to the other. Johnson was robust, combative, and concrete; Coleridge was the opposite. The contrast was perhaps in his mind when he said of Johnson: “his bow-wow manner must have had a good deal to do with the effect produced.””
—Virginia Woolf (1882–1941)
“These people figured video was the Lord’s preferred means of communicating, the screen itself a kind of perpetually burning bush. “He’s in the de-tails,” Sublett had said once. “You gotta watch for Him close.””
—William Gibson (b. 1948)