The Reaction To The Judgement
Chile accepted the judgement immediately and enacted it into its domestic law on 14 June 1977 (decree n°416 over the base lines).
On 25 January 1978 Argentina repudiated the arbitration award. According to Argentina:
- the Argentine argument had been distorted and misrepresented.
- the judgement had covered topics outside its terms of reference
- the Court had drawn contradictory conclusions.
- the Court had made errors of interpretation.
- the Court had made geographical and historical errors.
- the Court had not properly balanced the arguments and evidence of each party.
It has been argued that the Argentine claims over the Beagle Channel could not be sustained from a legal point of view and that in practice many of their assertions were subjective.
Read more about this topic: Beagle Channel Arbitration
Famous quotes containing the words reaction and/or judgement:
“The excessive increase of anything often causes a reaction in the opposite direction.”
—Plato (c. 427347 B.C.)
“In truth, the care and expense of our fathers aims only at furnishing our heads with knowledge; of judgement and virtue, little news.”
—Michel de Montaigne (15331592)