Formal Statement
In the formal language of the Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms, the axiom reads:
or in words:
- Given any set A and any set B, if for every set C, C is a member of A if and only if C is a member of B, then A is equal to B.
(It is not really essential that C here be a set — but in ZF, everything is. See Ur-elements below for when this is violated.)
The converse, of this axiom follows from the substitution property of equality.
Read more about this topic: Axiom Of Extensionality
Famous quotes containing the words formal and/or statement:
“It is in the nature of allegory, as opposed to symbolism, to beg the question of absolute reality. The allegorist avails himself of a formal correspondence between “ideas” and “things,” both of which he assumes as given; he need not inquire whether either sphere is “real” or whether, in the final analysis, reality consists in their interaction.”
—Charles, Jr. Feidelson, U.S. educator, critic. Symbolism and American Literature, ch. 1, University of Chicago Press (1953)
“Children should know there are limits to family finances or they will confuse “we can’t afford that” with “they don’t want me to have it.” The first statement is a realistic and objective assessment of a situation, while the other carries an emotional message.”
—Jean Ross Peterson (20th century)