Australian Constitutional Law - The Constitution and The High Court

The Constitution and The High Court

Constitutional law in the Commonwealth of Australia consists mostly of that body of doctrine which interprets the Commonwealth Constitution. The Constitution itself is embodied in clause 9 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, which was passed by the British Parliament in 1900 after its text had been negotiated in Australian Constitutional Conventions in the 1890s and approved by the voters in each of the Australian colonies. (The British government did, however, insist on one change to the text, to allow a greater range of appeals to the Privy Council in London.) It came into force on 1 January 1901, at which time the Commonwealth of Australia came into being.

The Constitution created a framework of government some of whose main features, and sources of inspiration, were the following:

  • constitutional monarchy (British and existing colonial models)
  • federalism (United States model)
  • parliamentary, or "responsible", government (British and existing colonial models)
  • distinct textual separation of powers (US model)
  • direct election to both Houses of Parliament (then a novelty)
  • requirement of a referendum for amendment of the Constitution (Swiss model)
  • only very limited guarantees of personal rights (rejection of the US model)
  • judicial review (US model)

This last feature – the ability of the courts to declare legislation unconstitutional and therefore invalid – is itself the source of the body of constitutional doctrine examined in this article. It has its origin in American experience, where the right of the Supreme Court of the United States to strike down legislation deemed incompatible with the Constitution was first asserted by the Supreme Court itself in the seminal case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803. Although completely foreign to both British and Australian colonial experience, the framers of the Australian Constitution clearly intended that the practice would take hold in Australia, and even expressly adverted to it in the Constitutional text (in section 76). This power of judicial review of legislation for conformity with the Constitution has been exercised almost exclusively by the High Court of Australia, and almost invariably with a Full Bench of all its members.

A brief overview of the other listed features will provide a background for the doctrinal developments examined below.

Read more about this topic:  Australian Constitutional Law

Famous quotes containing the words constitution, high and/or court:

    The real essence, the internal qualities, and constitution of even the meanest object, is hid from our view; something there is in every drop of water, every grain of sand, which it is beyond the power of human understanding to fathom or comprehend. But it is evident ... that we are influenced by false principles to that degree as to mistrust our senses, and think we know nothing of those things which we perfectly comprehend.
    George Berkeley (1685–1753)

    And the shuttle never falters, but to draw an encouraging conclusion
    From this would be considerable, too odd. Why not just
    Breathe in with the courage of each day, recognizing yourself as one
    Who must with difficulty get down from high places?
    John Ashbery (b. 1927)

    To rear a tiger is to court calamity.
    Chinese proverb.