Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd V Commonwealth - The Case

The Case

The most important argument made by the plaintiffs was that the new laws interfered with a right to free political speech which was implied in the Constitution. They also argued that the parts of the Act requiring that broadcasters give "free time" to certain people was an unjust acquisition of property. The Government of New South Wales argued that the laws were discriminatory against the states and they interfered with the proper business of State Governments.

Read more about this topic:  Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd V Commonwealth

Famous quotes containing the word case:

    “The woods were as fresh and full of vegetable life as a lichen in wet weather, and contained many interesting plants; but unless they are of white pine, they are treated with as little respect here as a mildew, and in the other case they are only the more quickly cut down.”
    —Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    “When a cat cries over a rat, it’s a case of false compassion.”
    —Chinese proverb.