Potential Global Impact
Being a renewable and carbon-neutral source of solar fuels, producing either hydrogen or carbohydrates, artificial photosynthesis is set apart from other popular renewable energy sources, specifically hydroelectric, solar photovoltaic, geothermal, and wind — which produce electricity directly with no fuel intermediate. As such, artificial photosynthesis may become a very important source of fuel for transportation. Unlike biomass energy, it does not require arable land and, consequently, will not compete with the food supply.
At the fifteenth meeting of the International Congress of Photosynthesis Research (ISPR) in Beijing 27 August 2010, a proposal was made for a "macroscience" Global Artificial Photosynthesis (GAP) Project, with seven models being presented for evaluation. An international conference on the subject took place between the fourteenth and eighteenth of August 2011 at Lord Howe Island under the auspices of the UNESCO Natural Sciences Sector. The meeting featured presentations from both scientists and non-scientific members of the society from across the globe, such as Peidong Yang, Dan Nocera and Michael Kirby and the papers presented have now been edited for a special open-source edition of the Australian Journal of Chemistry. It has been argued that photosynthesis in its natural and artificial forms should be declared common heritage of humanity under international law and that global artificial photosynthesis should be considered the moral culmination of nanotechnology.
Read more about this topic: Artificial Photosynthesis
Famous quotes containing the words potential, global and/or impact:
“Much of what contrives to create critical moments in parenting stems from a fundamental misunderstanding as to what the child is capable of at any given age. If a parent misjudges a child’s limitations as well as his own abilities, the potential exists for unreasonable expectations, frustration, disappointment and an unrealistic belief that what the child really needs is to be punished.”
—Lawrence Balter (20th century)
“The Sage of Toronto ... spent several decades marveling at the numerous freedoms created by a “global village” instantly and effortlessly accessible to all. Villages, unlike towns, have always been ruled by conformism, isolation, petty surveillance, boredom and repetitive malicious gossip about the same families. Which is a precise enough description of the global spectacle’s present vulgarity.”
—Guy Debord (b. 1931)
“Television does not dominate or insist, as movies do. It is not sensational, but taken for granted. Insistence would destroy it, for its message is so dire that it relies on being the background drone that counters silence. For most of us, it is something turned on and off as we would the light. It is a service, not a luxury or a thing of choice.”
—David Thomson, U.S. film historian. America in the Dark: The Impact of Hollywood Films on American Culture, ch. 8, William Morrow (1977)