Definition
For natural numbers the arithmetic derivative is defined as follows:
- for any prime .
- for any (Leibniz rule).
To coincide with the Leibniz rule is defined to be, as is . Explicitly, assume that
where are distinct primes and are positive integers. Then
The arithmetic derivative also preserves the power rule (for primes):
where is prime and is a positive integer. For example,
The sequence of number derivatives for k = 0, 1, 2, ... begins (sequence A003415 in OEIS):
- 0, 0, 1, 1, 4, 1, 5, 1, 12, 6, 7, 1, 16, 1, 9, ....
E. J. Barbeau was the first to formalize this definition. He extended it to all integers by proving that uniquely defines the derivative over the integers. Barbeau also further extended it to rational numbers,showing that the familiar quotient rule gives a well-defined derivative on Q:
Victor Ufnarovski and Bo Åhlander expanded it to certain irrationals. In these extensions, the formula above still applies, but the exponents are allowed to be arbitrary rational numbers.
The logarithmic derivative is a totally additive function.
Read more about this topic: Arithmetic Derivative
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“According to our social pyramid, all men who feel displaced racially, culturally, and/or because of economic hardships will turn on those whom they feel they can order and humiliate, usually women, children, and animals—just as they have been ordered and humiliated by those privileged few who are in power. However, this definition does not explain why there are privileged men who behave this way toward women.”
—Ana Castillo (b. 1953)
“The physicians say, they are not materialists; but they are:MSpirit is matter reduced to an extreme thinness: O so thin!—But the definition of spiritual should be, that which is its own evidence. What notions do they attach to love! what to religion! One would not willingly pronounce these words in their hearing, and give them the occasion to profane them.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)
“It’s a rare parent who can see his or her child clearly and objectively. At a school board meeting I attended . . . the only definition of a gifted child on which everyone in the audience could agree was “mine.””
—Jane Adams (20th century)