Arithmetic Derivative - Definition

Definition

For natural numbers the arithmetic derivative is defined as follows:

  • for any prime .
  • for any (Leibniz rule).

To coincide with the Leibniz rule is defined to be, as is . Explicitly, assume that

where are distinct primes and are positive integers. Then

The arithmetic derivative also preserves the power rule (for primes):

where is prime and is a positive integer. For example,


\begin{align}
81' = (3^4)' & = (9\cdot 9)' = 9'\cdot 9 + 9\cdot 9' = 2 \\
& = 2 = 2 = 108 = 4\cdot 3^3.
\end{align}

The sequence of number derivatives for k = 0, 1, 2, ... begins (sequence A003415 in OEIS):

0, 0, 1, 1, 4, 1, 5, 1, 12, 6, 7, 1, 16, 1, 9, ....

E. J. Barbeau was the first to formalize this definition. He extended it to all integers by proving that uniquely defines the derivative over the integers. Barbeau also further extended it to rational numbers,showing that the familiar quotient rule gives a well-defined derivative on Q:

Victor Ufnarovski and Bo Ã…hlander expanded it to certain irrationals. In these extensions, the formula above still applies, but the exponents are allowed to be arbitrary rational numbers.

The logarithmic derivative is a totally additive function.

Read more about this topic:  Arithmetic Derivative

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    The man who knows governments most completely is he who troubles himself least about a definition which shall give their essence. Enjoying an intimate acquaintance with all their particularities in turn, he would naturally regard an abstract conception in which these were unified as a thing more misleading than enlightening.
    William James (1842–1910)

    Was man made stupid to see his own stupidity?
    Is God by definition indifferent, beyond us all?
    Is the eternal truth man’s fighting soul
    Wherein the Beast ravens in its own avidity?
    Richard Eberhart (b. 1904)

    Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.
    Walter Pater (1839–1894)