Architecture of Turkey - 1920s and 1930s: First National Architectural Movement and Modernism

1920s and 1930s: First National Architectural Movement and Modernism

First National Architectural Movement (in Turkish: Birinci Ulusal Mimarlik Akimi) was an architectural movement led by Turkish architects Vedat Tek and Mimar Kemaleddin Bey. Followers of the movement wanted to create a new architecture which was based on motifs from Ottoman architecture but without Arabic or Islamic references. The movement was also labelled Turkish Neoclassical or the National Architectural Renaissance. The other followers of this movement were Arif Hikmet Koyunoglu and Giulio Mongeri. Buildings from this era are the State Art and Sculpture Museum (1927–30), Ethnography Museum of Ankara (1925–28), Bebek Mosque, Kamer Hatun Mosque and Tayyare Apartment Building.

There were various architectural experiments in the 1920s and 1930s as well. Ankara Central Station (1937) and Florya Atatürk Marine Mansion (1935) are considered as more contemporary architectural examples of the era.

  • First Ziraat Bank Headquarters (1925–29) in Ankara designed by Giulio Mongeri is an important symbol of the First National Architectural Movement.

  • State Art and Sculpture Museum designed by Arif Hikmet Koyunoğlu (1927–30)

  • Designed by Şekip Akalın, Ankara Central Station (1937) is a notable art deco design of its era.

Read more about this topic:  Architecture Of Turkey

Famous quotes containing the words movement, modernism and/or national:

    “There is no example in history of a revolutionary movement involving such gigantic masses being so bloodless.”
    —Leon Trotsky (1879–1940)

    “By Modernism I mean the positive rejection of the past and the blind belief in the process of change, in novelty for its own sake, in the idea that progress through time equates with cultural progress; in the cult of individuality, originality and self-expression.”
    —Dan Cruickshank (b. 1949)

    “All experience teaches that, whenever there is a great national establishment, employing large numbers of officials, the public must be reconciled to support many incompetent men; for such is the favoritism and nepotism always prevailing in the purlieus of these establishments, that some incompetent persons are always admitted, to the exclusion of many of the worthy.”
    —Herman Melville (1819–1891)