Definition
Given a metric space (X,d), or more generally, an extended pseudoquasimetric (which will be abbreviated xpq-metric here), one can define an induced map d:X×P(X)→ by d(x,A) = inf { d(x,a ) : a ∈ A }. With this example in mind, a distance on X is defined to be a map X×P(X)→ satisfying for all x in X and A, B ⊆ X,
- d(x,{x}) = 0 ;
- d(x,Ø) = ∞ ;
- d(x,A∪B) = min d(x,A),d(x,B) ;
- For all ε, 0≤ε≤∞, d(x,A) ≤ d(x,A(ε)) + ε ;
where A(ε) = { x : d(x,A) ≤ ε } by definition.
(The "empty infimum is positive infinity" convention is like the nullary intersection is everything convention.)
An approach space is defined to be a pair (X,d) where d is a distance function on X. Every approach space has a topology, given by treating A → A(0) as a Kuratowski closure operator.
The appropriate maps between approach spaces are the contractions. A map f:(X,d)→(Y,e) is a contraction if e(f(x),f) ≤ d(x,A) for all x ∈ X, A ⊆ X.
Read more about this topic: Approach Space
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“Although there is no universal agreement as to a definition of life, its biological manifestations are generally considered to be organization, metabolism, growth, irritability, adaptation, and reproduction.”
—The Columbia Encyclopedia, Fifth Edition, the first sentence of the article on “life” (based on wording in the First Edition, 1935)
“Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
—Walter Pater (1839–1894)
“Scientific method is the way to truth, but it affords, even in
principle, no unique definition of truth. Any so-called pragmatic
definition of truth is doomed to failure equally.”
—Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)