Apportionment in The European Parliament - Nice System

Nice System

The last European parliamentary elections were conducted under the rules included in the Nice Treaty which provided for a maximum number of 736, although that figure had been breached on the accession of new members to the EU. These state being allowed parliamentary representation without a corresponding reduction in the number of MEPs allotted to other member states. This happened in 2007 on the accession of Romania and Bulgaria joined in 2007, when the number of seats temporarily increased to 785. It subsequently returned to 736 in the 2009 election.

736 seats for about 500 million EU citizens meant that there were on average 670,000 citizens represented by each MEP. Some states divide the electorate for their allocated MEPs into sub-national constituencies. However they may not be divided in such a way that the system would no longer be proportional.

Relative influence of voters from different EU member states (2003)
Member
state
Population
millions
MEPs
Inhabitants
per MEP
Influence
Austria 8.27 17 486,235 1.71
Belgium 10.51 22 477,773 1.74
Bulgaria 7.72 17 454,059 1.83
Cyprus 0.77 6 127,667 6.52
Czech Republic 10.25 22 465,955 1.79
Denmark 5.43 13 417,538 1.99
Estonia 1.34 6 224,000 3.72
Finland 5.26 13 404,308 2.06
France 62.89 72 873,417 0.95
Germany 82.43 99 832,606 1
Greece 11.13 22 505,682 1.65
Hungary 10.08 22 458,045 1.82
Ireland 4.21 12 350,750 2.37
Italy 58.75 72 816,000 1.02
Latvia 2.3 8 286,875 2.9
Lithuania 3.4 12 283,583 2.94
Luxembourg 0.46 6 76,667 10.86
Malta 0.4 5 80,800 10.3
Netherlands 16.33 25 653,360 1.27
Poland 38.16 50 763,140 1.09
Portugal 10.57 22 480,455 1.73
Romania 21.61 33 654,848 1.27
Slovakia 5.39 13 414,538 2.01
Slovenia 2 7 286,143 2.91
Spain 43.76 50 875,160 0.95
Sweden 9.05 18 502,667 1.66
United Kingdom 60.42 72 839,194 0.99

Read more about this topic:  Apportionment In The European Parliament

Famous quotes containing the words nice and/or system:

    Too nice is neighbor’s fool.
    Common Dutch saying, trans by Johanna C. Prins.

    The individual protests against the world, but he doesn’t get beyond protest, he is just a single protester. When he wants to be more than that, he has to counter power with power, he has to oppose the system with another system.
    Friedrich Dürrenmatt (1921–1990)