Akku - Table of Rechargeable Battery Types

Table of Rechargeable Battery Types

Type Voltagea Energy densityb Powerc Effi.d E/$e Disch.f Cyclesg Lifeh
(V) (MJ/kg) (Wh/kg) (Wh/L) (W/kg) (%) (Wh/$) (%/month) (#) (years)
Lead–acid 2.1 0.11-0.14 30-40 60-75 180 70%-92% 5-8 3%-4% 500-800 5-8 (automotive battery), 20 (stationary)
Alkaline 1.5 0.31 85 250 50 -- 7.7 <0.3 100-1000 <5
Nickel–iron 1.2 0.18 50 100 65% 5-7.3 20%-40% 50+
Nickel–cadmium 1.2 0.14-0.22 40-60 50-150 150 70%-90% 1.25-2.5 20% 1500
Nickel–hydrogen 1.5 0.27 75 60 220 85% 20,000+ 15+ (satellite application with frequent charge-discharge cycles)
Nickel–metal hydride 1.2 0.11-0.29 30-80 140-300 250-1000 66% 2.75 30% 500-1000
Nickel–zinc 1.7 0.22 60 170 900 2-3.3 100-500
Lithium-air (organic) 2.7 7.2 2000 2000 400 ~100
Lithium-ion 3.6 0.58 150-250 250-360 1800 99%+ 2.8-5 5%-10% 1200-10000 2-6
Lithium-ion polymer 3.7 0.47-0.72 130-200 300 3000+ 99.8% 2.8-5.0 5% 500~1000 2-3
Lithium iron phosphate 3.25 0.32-0.4 80-120 170 1400 93.5% 0.7-3.0 2000+ >10
Lithium sulfur 2.0 0.94-1.44 400 350 ~100
Lithium–titanate 2.3 0.32 90 4000+ 87-95%r 0.5-1.0 9000+ 20+
Sodium-ion 1.7 30 85% 3.3 5000+ Still testing
Thin film lithium ? 350 959 ? ?p 40000
Zinc bromide 0.27-0.31 75-85
Vanadium redox 1.15-1.55 0.09-0.13 25-35 80% 20% 14,000 10(stationary)
Sodium-sulfur 0.54 150 89%-92%
Molten salt 2.58 0.25-1.04 70-290 160 150-220 4.54 3000+ <=20
Silver-oxide 1.86 0.47 130 240
Notes
  • a Nominal cell voltage in V.
  • b Energy density = energy/weight or energy/size, given in three different units
  • c Specific power = power/weight in W/kg
  • d Charge/discharge efficiency in %
  • e Energy/consumer price in W·h/US$ (approximately)
  • f Self-discharge rate in %/month
  • g Cycle durability in number of cycles
  • h Time durability in years
  • i VRLA or recombinant includes gel batteries and absorbed glass mats
  • p Pilot production
  • r Depending upon charge rate

Read more about this topic:  Akku

Famous quotes containing the words table and/or types:

    How to attain sufficient clarity of thought to meet the terrifying issues now facing us, before it is too late, is ... important. Of one thing I feel reasonably sure: we can’t stop to discuss whether the table has or hasn’t legs when the house is burning down over our heads. Nor do the classics per se seem to furnish the kind of education which fits people to cope with a fast-changing civilization.
    Mary Barnett Gilson (1877–?)

    The wider the range of possibilities we offer children, the more intense will be their motivations and the richer their experiences. We must widen the range of topics and goals, the types of situations we offer and their degree of structure, the kinds and combinations of resources and materials, and the possible interactions with things, peers, and adults.
    Loris Malaguzzi (1920–1994)