Agenda-setting Theory

Agenda-setting Theory

Agenda-setting theory describes the "ability to influence the salience of topics on the public agenda." That is, if a news item is covered frequently and prominently the audience will regard the issue as more important. Mass media only shows you what they comprehend as an important issue. Print or broadcast news will then take away the audiences ability to think for themselves. Agenda-setting theory was formally developed by Dr. Max McCombs and Dr. Donald Shaw in a study on the 1968 presidential election. In the 1968 "Chapel Hill study," McCombs and Shaw demonstrated a strong correlation (r > .9) between what 100 residents of Chapel Hill, North Carolina thought was the most important election issue and what the local and national news media reported was the most important issue. By comparing the salience of issues in news content with the public's perceptions of the most important election issue, McCombs and Shaw were able to determine the degree to which the media determines public opinion. Since the 1968 study, published in a 1972 edition of Public Opinion Quarterly, more than 400 studies have been published on the agenda-setting function of the mass media, and the theory continues to be regarded as relevant.

Read more about Agenda-setting Theory:  History, Core Assumptions and Statements, Agenda-setting Vs. Agenda-building, Three Types of Agenda-Setting, Role of Public in Agenda-Building Process, Framing or Second-Level Agenda-Setting?, Non-Political Application, Contributions, Future of Agenda-Setting Theory, Criticisms

Famous quotes containing the word theory:

    Freud was a hero. He descended to the “Underworld” and met there stark terrors. He carried with him his theory as a Medusa’s head which turned these terrors to stone.
    —R.D. (Ronald David)