Abstract Simplicial Complex - Geometric Realization

We can associate to an abstract simplicial complex K a topological space |K|, called its geometric realization, which is a simplicial complex. The construction goes as follows.

First, define |K| as a subset of ^S consisting of functions t:S → satisfying the two conditions:

Now think of ^S as the direct limit of ^A where A ranges over finite subsets of S, and give ^S the induced topology. Now give |K| the subspace topology.

Alternatively, let denote the category whose objects are the faces of K and whose morphisms are inclusions. Next choose a total order on the vertex set of K and define a functor F from to the category of topological spaces as follows. For any face XK of dimension n, let F(X) = Δn be the standard n-simplex. The order on the vertex set then specifies a unique bijection between the elements of X and vertices of Δn, ordered in the usual way e0 < e1 < ... < en. If YX is a face of dimension m < n, then this bijection specifies a unique m-dimensional face of Δn. Define F(Y) → F(X) to be the unique affine linear embedding of Δm as that distinguished face of Δn, such that the map on vertices is order preserving.

We can then define the geometric realization |K| as the colimit of the functor F. More specifically |K| is the quotient space of the disjoint union

by the equivalence relation which identifies a point yF(Y) with its image under the map F(Y) → F(X), for every inclusion YX.

If K is finite, then we can describe |K| more simply. Choose an embedding of the vertex set of K as an affinely independent subset of some Euclidean space RN of sufficiently high dimension N. Then any face XK can be identified with the geometric simplex in RN spanned by the corresponding embedded vertices. Take |K| to be the union of all such simplices.

If K is the standard combinatorial n-simplex, then clearly |K| can be naturally identified with Δn.

Read more about this topic:  Abstract Simplicial Complex

Famous quotes containing the words geometric and/or realization:

    In mathematics he was greater
    Than Tycho Brahe, or Erra Pater:
    For he, by geometric scale,
    Could take the size of pots of ale;
    Resolve, by sines and tangents straight,
    If bread and butter wanted weight;
    And wisely tell what hour o’ th’ day
    The clock doth strike, by algebra.
    Samuel Butler (1612–1680)

    Probably nothing in the experience of the rank and file of workers causes more bitterness and envy than the realization which comes sooner or later to many of them that they are “stuck” and can go no further.
    Mary Barnett Gilson (1877–?)