The book was intended to help reform mathematics teaching in the UK, and more specifically in the University of Cambridge and in schools preparing to study higher mathematics. It was aimed directly at "scholarship level" students — the top 10% to 20% by ability. Hardy himself did not originally find a passion for mathematics only seeing it as a way to beat the other students, which he did decisively, and gain scholarships. However, his book excels in effectively explaining analytical number theory and calculus following the rigor of mathematics.
Whilst his book changed the way the subject was taught at university, the content reflects the era in which the book was written. The whole book explores number theory and the author constructs real numbers theoretically. It adequately deals with single-variable calculus, sequences, number series, properties of cos, sin, log, etc. but does not refer to mathematical groups, multi-variable functions or vector calculus. Each section includes some demanding problems. Hardy combines the enthusiasm of the missionary with the rigor of the purist in his exposition of the fundamental ideas of the differential and integral calculus, of the properties of infinite series and of other topics involving the notion of limit. Hardy's presentation of mathematical analysis is as valid today as when first written: students will find that his economical and energetic style of presentation is one that modern authors rarely come close to. Despite its limitations, it is considered a classic in its field. It is probably of most use to 1st year university students of pure mathematics.
Read more about this topic: A Course Of Pure Mathematics
Other articles related to "review, reviews":
... The team made a sound start, with an encouraging home draw with much fancied Nottingham Forest, and they peaked at 5th on 21 October 2006 ... Some of the results in that period flattered the performances and the wheels came off in the next game with a 3–0 loss to Brighton Hove Albion ...
... the patent unreasonableness test was a standard of review used by a court when performing judicial review of administrative decisions ... It was the highest of three standards of review correctness, unreasonableness, and patent unreasonableness ... the Supreme Court of Canada noted that the test for whether a decision under review is patently unreasonable is articulated differently for findings of fact and findings of law ...
... "Vogue" has received generally positive reviews from critics ... In a review of The Immaculate Collection, Stephen Thomas Erlewine also claimed that the song was "sleek" and "stylish" ... Promis, in another Allmusic review, claimed that "Vogue" was a "crowning artistic achievement" ...
... While reviews for the album were generally positive, gaining a 78 out of 100 on review aggregating site Metacritic based on 30 reviews, the general consensus on the album ... the band "have all but given birth to an identical twin." A positive review from Rolling Stone said that "the Strokes have resisted the temptation to hit ...
... an assessment of facilities (people, vessels, computers, satellites) a review of federal activities a review of the cumulative effect of federal laws a review of the supply and demand for ocean and coastal resources ...
Famous quotes containing the word review:
“Generally there is no consistent evidence of significant differences in school achievement between children of working and nonworking mothers, but differences that do appear are often related to maternal satisfaction with her chosen role, and the quality of substitute care.”
—Ruth E. Zambrana, U.S. researcher, M. Hurst, and R.L. Hite. The Working Mother in Contemporary Perspectives: A Review of Literature, Pediatrics (December 1979)
“The thanksgiving of the old Jew, Lord, I thank Thee that Thou didst not make me a woman, doubtless came from a careful review of the situation. Like all of us, he had fortitude enough to bear his neighbors afflictions.”
—Frances A. Griffin, U.S. suffragist. As quoted in History of Woman Suffrage, vol. 4, ch. 19, by Susan B. Anthony and Ida Husted Harper (1902)
“If God had meant Harvard professors to appear in People magazine, She wouldnt have invented The New York Review of Books.”
—Anna Quindlen (b. 1952)