4EGI-1 - Binding Site Specifics and Effects of Use

Binding Site Specifics and Effects of Use

4EGI-1, like 4E-BP polypeptides, displaces eIF4G by associating with a binding site on E. Not only does the synthetic molecule prevent the association between the two initiation factors, but by binding to a different portion of E via the same motif, it has been shown to actually increase the binding affinity of E for endogenous (originating within an organism) 4E-BP1.1 The Harvard research group leading the study screened 16,000 compounds, looking for one that would displace a fluorescein-labeled peptide derived from the G sequence that binds to the E form at the same site. Eventually they turned up 4EGI-1, which displaced eIF4G by binding to a smaller subset of its binding site (on E). The newly found molecule had the added advantage of enhancing 4E-BP1 binding, a surprise given that this molecule is also believed to bind eIF4E via the same motif. It appears that by displacing the G sequence without blocking the entire binding interface of E, 4EGI-1 is able to clear the “docking site” of the endogenous regulator.

Read more about this topic:  4EGI-1

Famous quotes containing the words binding, site and/or effects:

    What is lawful is not binding only on some and not binding on others. Lawfulness extends everywhere, through the wide-ruling air and the boundless light of the sky.
    Empedocles 484–424 B.C., Greek philosopher. The Presocratics, p. 142, ed. Philip Wheelwright, The Bobbs-Merrill Co., Inc. (1960)

    It is not menstrual blood per se which disturbs the imagination—unstanchable as that red flood may be—but rather the albumen in the blood, the uterine shreds, placental jellyfish of the female sea. This is the chthonian matrix from which we rose. We have an evolutionary revulsion from slime, our site of biologic origins. Every month, it is woman’s fate to face the abyss of time and being, the abyss which is herself.
    Camille Paglia (b. 1947)

    Society’s double behavioral standard for women and for men is, in fact, a more effective deterrent than economic discrimination because it is more insidious, less tangible. Economic disadvantages involve ascertainable amounts, but the very nature of societal value judgments makes them harder to define, their effects harder to relate.
    Anne Tucker (b. 1945)