1989 World Ice Hockey Championships - World Championship Group C (Australia)

World Championship Group C (Australia)

Played in Sydney 18–27 March.

Team Games Won Drawn Lost Points difference Points
17 Netherlands 7 7 0 0 48 - 15 14
18 Yugoslavia 7 6 0 1 55 - 15 12
19 China 7 4 1 2 31 - 29 9
20 Hungary 7 3 1 3 32 - 30 7
21 Bulgaria 7 3 1 3 35 - 35 7
22 North Korea 7 2 0 5 26 - 40 4
23 South Korea 7 1 1 5 27 - 46 3
24 Australia 7 0 0 7 14 - 58 0

The Netherlands were promoted to Group B, and Australia was relegated to Group D.

18 March Yugoslavia 8-1
 Bulgaria

18 March Hungary 6-3
 North Korea

18 March Netherlands 5-2
 South Korea

18 March Australia 1-3
 China

19 March Yugoslavia 11-2
 South Korea

19 March Australia 2-9
 Hungary

20 March Bulgaria 3-3
 China

20 March Netherlands 3-1
 North Korea

21 March China 5-3
 Hungary

21 March Netherlands 4-1
 Bulgaria

21 March North Korea 7-4
 South Korea

21 March Australia 2-8
 Yugoslavia

22 March Hungary 0-3
 Yugoslavia

22 March Australia 2-6
 South Korea

23 March China 5-8
 Netherlands

23 March Bulgaria 8-4
 North Korea

24 March South Korea 4-10
 China

24 March Yugoslavia 14-1
 North Korea

24 March Hungary 7-4
 Bulgaria

24 March Australia 1-12
 Netherlands

26 March Bulgaria 6-4
 South Korea

26 March China 1-8
 Yugoslavia

26 March Netherlands 8-2
 Hungary

26 March Australia 1-8
 North Korea

27 March North Korea 2-4
 China

27 March South Korea 5-5
 Hungary

27 March Yugoslavia 3-8
 Netherlands

27 March Australia 5-12
 Bulgaria

Read more about this topic:  1989 World Ice Hockey Championships

Famous quotes containing the words world and/or group:

    “O, the world hath not a sweeter creature! She might lie by an emperor’s side and command him tasks.”
    —William Shakespeare (1564–1616)

    “Unless a group of workers know their work is under surveillance, that they are being rated as fairly as human beings, with the fallibility that goes with human judgment, can rate them, and that at least an attempt is made to measure their worth to an organization in relative terms, they are likely to sink back on length of service as the sole reason for retention and promotion.”
    —Mary Barnett Gilson (1877–?)